Presumably if the people that really mattered - eg airline bosses, potential passengers etc - had a strong opinion on the cladding and external appearance of the building, the airport would have gone for a more premium product.
But they are ‘venturing’ down a different route with an appeal hearing scheduled in just a few weeks. Why, having invested all the time and cost of this CLUED process, would they change course now?
Can you slot sit for just 6 weeks. Surely to protect a slot you would have to operate for the full IATA season. And is GVA sufficiently slot-constrained that EZY would need to undertake slot sitting? They look to have 14 or 15 aircraft based at GVA, so isn't a much more likely explanation...
I’m a bit baffled why people are giving the reason for aircraft not diverting into LBA ‘as technical’ or related to the runway length. I mean, sure, A380s aren’t coming here for obvious reasons. But 737s, A320s etc - the aircraft that fly in and out every day, it’s bizzare. Meanwhile, the...
3mm of slush on the runway following the brief blizzard referred to by WH. Only took about 20-25 mins to brush it off and remove it completely. Aer Lingus was able to hold and land once cleared. Ryanair couldn’t hang around so went to EMA.
yes it does. The glideslope antenna is not on the runway, it’s on the grass, about 100m to the side of the runway centreline. Therefore its an issue with the condition of the ground in front of the antenna, not the condition of the runway. If suddenly that ground is 8 inches higher and is...
There was a live stream from MAN yesterday morning - available on YouTube. The accumulation of snow was nothing like those at LBA. At MAN, even early yesterday morning, you could still see the grass at the side of the runway and in front of the Glideslope antenna. At LBA the accumulation...
It LBA has, for example, 5 to 6 inches more snow than Manchester then there will an an extra 11,000 cubic metres of snow to clear just from the runway, even though MAN’s runway is longer. 11,000 cubic metres is the same as the snow being 5ft high covering a standard football pitch.
The point of higher taxes is to raise money. If the motivation was about reducing demand for flying then (a) taxes rises would be higher (b) they would have explicitly linked the tax rise to a targeted reduction in flying and (c) they wouldn’t be talking up airport expansion at places like...
The Labour government announced very recently they weren’t against airport expansion and one of the first things they did in power was to overrule Newham council with regard to LCY’s passenger cap...
I must admit that wasn’t my interpretation of the recent written update to the council’s executive board. It said the initial public sector contribution to capitalising the SPV would need to be ‘greater than initially envisaged’ or words to that effect, but I didn’t see anything to suggest...
What would you have done differently? From the comfort of their armchair, people always seem to rush to their keyboard to criticise, but seldom offer alternatives
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Sure, ad-blocking software does a great job at blocking ads, but it also blocks some useful and important features of our website. For the best possible site experience please take a moment to disable your AdBlocker.