Aviador

Administrator
Staff member
Subscriber
Jan 12, 2009
17,751
373
HEAD OFFICE
United-Kingdom
[textarea]Asiana 777-200ER crashes at San Francisco airport

As visual evidence accumulated showing signs of a runway under-shoot, the US National Transportation Safety Board says it will dispatch a team to investigate.

Full Story: http://www.flightglobal.com/news/articl ... rt-388004/[/textarea]

Any thoughts or speculations about what could have caused the accident. I wonder if it could be something similar to the BA Heathrow 777 accident a couple of years back?
 
Any thoughts or speculations about what could have caused the accident. I wonder if it could be something similar to the BA Heathrow 777 accident a couple of years back?

Apparently this aircraft wasn't equpped with Rolls Royce engines as in the LHR incident.

A lot of speculation on another site that is frequented in the main by pilots and other aviation professionals that concentrated on the ILS glideslope for the runway in question and its parallel neighbour. It seems the glideslope has been out of action and will be until August.

The consensus of these professionals, some of whom piloted commercial aircraft onto the glideslope-less runways at SFO in the hours before this incident, is that it should not have been a problem for a qualified airline flight crew but that it might have been.

I'm in no way qualified to make any sort of judgement.

However, I know that we do have some professional pilot and ATC staff as members and I'd be very interested in anything they might care to say about this tragic incident.
 
According to a report on the BBC the aircraft's speed was too low as it approached the runway threshold.
 
  • Thread starter
  • Admin
  • #4
The American NTSB has confirmed the speed of the Asiana aircraft had reduced to 102 knots prior to the accident.

On another note I see by overhead images of the runway it appears the runway threshold had been moved recently with the old touchdown markers blacked out and the news ones further down the runway. Had the accident happened prior to the new touchdown markers being painted, the aircraft would probably have hit the sea before the runway which would likely have lead to significantly more fatalities.

asiana_b772_hl7742_san_francisco_130706_6.jpg

SourceAerial Overview of sea wall to final position (Photo: Reuters)
 

Upload Media

Upgrade Your Account

Subscribe to help support your favourite forum and in return we'll remove all our advertisements. Your contribution will help to pay for things like site maintenance, domain name renewals and annual server charges.



Forums4aiports
Subscribe

NEW - Profile Posts

9 trips in 9 days done 70 miles walked and over 23-00 photos taken with a large number taken at 20mph or above. Heavy rain on 1 day only
5 trips done and 45 miles walked,. Also the RAF has had 4 F35B Lightning follow me yesterday and today....
My plans got altered slightly as one of the minibus companies had to cancel 3 trips and refunded me but will be getting nice discount when I rebook them.
wondering why on my "holidays" I choose to get up 2 hours earlier than when going to work. 6 trips in 6 days soon coming up with 3 more days to sort out

Trending Hashtags

Advertisement

Back
Top Bottom
AdBlock Detected

We get it, advertisements are annoying!

Sure, ad-blocking software does a great job at blocking ads, but it also blocks useful features of our website. For the best site experience please disable your AdBlocker.

I've Disabled AdBlock