Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Someone elsewhere has done a load of mock bookings and the seat plans suggest around 15 seats taken on most flights. So over 50% loads which I think is ok for eastern. Perhaps companies are block booking seats and the rest are being sold to the general public?Does anyone know how the Esbjerg passenger figures ars holding up (or not)?
First flight from Thursday 30th March.Did the EMA to NQY service start in Feb ?
Esbjerg suspended until September, though judging by the loads it remains to be seen whether it will return at all, not sure if the announcement of the worlds largest wind farm off the coast of Yorkshire/lincolnshire getting the go ahead will provide any further synergies.First flight from Thursday 30th March.
My understanding is Leeds didn’t want them there and increased charges accordingly.If they had stayed at LBA (but then would have had to pay bills) they would be making more money on SOU and NQY. But they made their choice........
I assume you’re referring to LBA impounding an Eastern aircraft for non payment of fees? It all ties in together, and is part of the same problem. Don’t think LBA are all that bothered about small capacity aircraft and I don’t think Eastern are therefore all that bothered about serving LBA.@pug not saying you are wrong about LBA not wanting them as such but there is more to it than that and is certainly not for me to say as I was asked to keep the actual reason confidential. However I know the reason has been posted by someone somewhere on the LBA forum in the last few months, just can’t remember who, where, when etc. I know T3 won’t be returning to LBA, just merely pointing out that they, like a lot of airlines, are missing out on huge potential by not serving LBA. That said with their new found unreliability and chopping/changing of schedules they would never build up to being as you say “the award winning airline of years gone by”
Personally I’m not to sure but I would have thought it would have been better direct. It doesn’t give the impression the routes performing well if they stopping at another airport. And presumably it’s still on the J41.Do wonder how well NQY will do with an added stop on the route though.
Did well last year at 2 x weekly, so wonder whether splitting loads is an operational issue..If they are having to split load a J41, then it's time to pack in.
Now cut fully according to SeanM on Twitter.Esbjerg suspended until September,
Not really surprising, good choice of route in theory as I know they collaborated with local industry on it. Clearly in practice the flexibility offered by KLM meant that it probably wasn’t viable to fly 3 x weekly on a turboprop and wouldn’t have generated enough traffic to offer a reasonable number of rotations. We know that a fairly large percentage of passengers using KLM connect onwards to Denmark and Scandinavia but best to leave it to KLM in my view as it provides the critical mass necessary to sustain the service whilst also providing the link to their global network.Now cut fully according to SeanM on Twitter.
No they only flew to CPHDidnt SAS operate this route at one time ?
I agree with that.The airport really should be playing to its strengths in terms of passenger flights and going after the leisure market for which there is latent demand, and not an airline that wants to fly a route between the hours of 9 and 5 Monday to Friday because it’s suits them from a staffing perspective.
Subscribe to help support your favourite forum and in return we'll remove all our advertisements. Your contribution will help to pay for things like site maintenance, domain name renewals and annual server charges.