Future Infrastructure Developments

[Aviador]

Is anyone else thinking like me in thinking this is going to get differed again.

 

[Aviador]

Some possible conditions appearing:

No additional flights until the terminal is complete
Provision of Hackney Carriage rank

 

[dmrodgers]

Sorry to say I agree with Aviador on this one, not looking good, we will back again with yet more amendments for a future meeting. Leeds City Council is made up of a bunch of idiots, obviously no one reads the agenda on this and we are going back over old ground. This should not be allowed as this has been passed in principle subject to the amendments. Its the amendments that should be discussed and nothing else.

 

[Aviador]

I'm sick to death of hearing Cllr Walshaw says "I think every member of this panel believes" (as he does)

 

[dmrodgers]

Summing up at present, not looking good, appears that decision will be deferred.

 

[LBA4EVER]

From what im seeing i just dont think this is going to be approved, i even think carol cunningham and the airport team are not presenting a good enough package here and i myself are very puzzled by the old terminal still remaining up and converted into further use, that really is weird, why would you keep that wreck of a building up! The airport team have just come back to the panal today and as far as im concerned ruined it!

 

[Hendi]

I'm not watching judging by your comments im glad I'm not! how have the ruined it lba4ever?

 

[dmrodgers]

Voting now taking place

 

[gavin1980]

Its like Handforth Parish...

 

[dmrodgers]

Vote for the application 9 for - against 5. Motion carried, subject to flying hours, taxi rank and demolition of existing terminal. Great news

 

[leedslad]

Flying hours being not in place until terminal open

 

[LBA4EVER]

Has it been approved or what! Two votes and both were 9 in favour to 5

 

[dmrodgers]

Good help Leeds with these councillors running the city, complete shambles, can't even get a zoom meeting right.

 

[dmrodgers]

Has it been approved or what! Two votes and both were 9 in favour to 5

Terminal approved 9 to 5

 

[LBA4EVER]

Will the airport be happy with them conditions? I take its approved?

 

[LBA787]

Is that full approval now or just as before?

 

[JRP]

Great news, I could not get the live internet feed so thanks to everyone for the updates on here much appreciated
Now for Leeds to win the Premier League next season

 

[Aviador]

Vote for the application 9 for - against 5. Motion carried, subject to flying hours, taxi rank and demolition of existing terminal. Great news

Is anyone clear whether this requires an additional vote in the future?

Just to clarify a point @dmrodgers post, the conditional regarding the existing terminal wasn't to demolish it, it was to provide detailed plans for the future of the site.

• Clear plan for the old terminal
• No additional extra flights until the completion of the new terminal
• Addition of Hackney Carriage taxi rank.

 

[gcoabc1]

Good help Leeds with these councillors running the city, complete shambles, can't even get a zoom meeting right.

As I understand it the motion to approve was given subject to;
Extended flight times not until new terminal built
Hard plan for future demolition/use of old terminal
Provision of a taxi rank for Hackney carriages.

Seems reasonable.

Now going for a lie down.

 

[LBAYORKIE]

Does demolition include the control tower?