TheLocalYokel
Honorary Member Of Forums4airports
- Jan 14, 2009
- 15,711
- 343
- IMPORTANT!! To reduce spam, we request that you make a post soon after completing your registration. We request you keep your account active by posting regularly. Inactive accounts risk being deleted.
- Yes
- Thread starter
- Admin
- #81
CO's strategy when it set up the BRS route was to use regional airports as a way of accessing the UK when it had no gateway at Heathrow.
Since that changed it abandoned its original London gateway at Gatwick and now Bristol.
Interestingly, the May figures for BRS-EWR were 8655, up 15% on May 2009, giving an average load of 140/load factor of nearly 80%.
BFS-EWR which on average is about 1,000 per passengers per month more than BRS was down 15% on May 2009 with 600 fewer passengers than the Bristol route. BRS also carried nearly 900 more passengers than BFS in April so maybe BFS-EWR might be being looked at very carefully by CO.
Since that changed it abandoned its original London gateway at Gatwick and now Bristol.
Interestingly, the May figures for BRS-EWR were 8655, up 15% on May 2009, giving an average load of 140/load factor of nearly 80%.
BFS-EWR which on average is about 1,000 per passengers per month more than BRS was down 15% on May 2009 with 600 fewer passengers than the Bristol route. BRS also carried nearly 900 more passengers than BFS in April so maybe BFS-EWR might be being looked at very carefully by CO.