There was actually a typo in my last post. I meant to say the attractive glass fronted design doesn't appear to feature.
I can't help but agree with you Yokel that the design looks entirely functional without much attention paid to aesthetics and creating a sense of space. Whilst a big step forward, the eastern extension suffers from the same problem. The exterior in particular is rather bland and the impression, from the outside at least, is of a disjointed and piecemeal development, compounded by the temporary looking check-in extension which seems to now be permanent. I suppose I probably shouldn't look to regional airports for inspirational architecture!
All this said, the airport deserves credit for pressing on much needed investment
I can't help but agree with you Yokel that the design looks entirely functional without much attention paid to aesthetics and creating a sense of space. Whilst a big step forward, the eastern extension suffers from the same problem. The exterior in particular is rather bland and the impression, from the outside at least, is of a disjointed and piecemeal development, compounded by the temporary looking check-in extension which seems to now be permanent. I suppose I probably shouldn't look to regional airports for inspirational architecture!
All this said, the airport deserves credit for pressing on much needed investment