Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
How big was that operation?They did have a Blackpool operation before the airport closed, which is obviously much smaller than Liverpool, but they seemed happy there.
PMI, ALC and AGP are routes that generally from most UK airports an airline would struggle to not make money on even with competition on the route.
I'm glad Blue Air are doing well hopefully they'll expand more in the future.Yes true, it probably a safer bet too to begin with. I understand they are doing particularly well on their Rome service.
Does anybody think Liverpool will be able to attract Jet 2 in the future?
They'd have to operate them on a W pattern or maybe use the BHD flight as i can't see them basing. They do something similar with Dusseldorf at Leeds.I wonder if Flybe might work better than Jet2 at Liverpool on European routes which are not offered by FR or EZY
They'd have to operate them on a W pattern or maybe use the BHD flight as i can't see them basing. They do something similar with Dusseldorf at Leeds.
The likes of easyJet and Ryanair operate many routes at airports with year-round load factors above 90% but they often don't increase frequencies, presumably because although there might be a demand the overall yield would suffer. I can quote specific examples of Ryanair axing routes where the monthly load factors have been consistently well above 90%. It can only be the yield: either it's not high enough for Ryanair or there are better options elsewhere either at other airports or on other routes at the airport where the route was dropped.There are a number of routes that are running at 90+ % full, and more capacity is needed. Tenerife is one that's like that, only think being 4 hours each way, ties a plane up for a long time
The likes of easyJet and Ryanair operate many routes at airports with year-round load factors above 90% but they often don't increase frequencies, presumably because although there might be a demand the overall yield would suffer. I can quote specific examples of Ryanair axing routes where the monthly load factors have been consistently well above 90%. It can only be the yield: either it's not high enough for Ryanair or there are better options elsewhere either at other airports or on other routes at the airport where the route was dropped.
I really can't think of any other explanation.
Subscribe to help support your favourite forum and in return we'll remove all our advertisements. Your contribution will help to pay for things like site maintenance, domain name renewals and annual server charges.