TheLocalYokel
Honorary Member Of Forums4airports
- Jan 14, 2009
- 15,711
- 343
- IMPORTANT!! To reduce spam, we request that you make a post soon after completing your registration. We request you keep your account active by posting regularly. Inactive accounts risk being deleted.
- Yes
- Admin
- #261
Journey time is elastic because not every one is going to go to Docklands and even the 30-minute check-in before the flight might not happen in reality. Most people will turn up before that if they've got any sense because security queues can be a problem and check-in times might be more than 30 minutes before the flight anyway. Respective rail and air fares will also be a factor for some.
I'm not sure that the prospect of a flight rather than a train will necessarily appeal to everyone by any means. The train will arrive at Cardiff city centre - the aircraft won't - and there might be a danger of us as aviation enthusiasts thinking that everyone would fly rather than go by rail if there was a choice. Lots of people, my wife included, only fly when there is no realistic alternative. Like many people she doesn't enjoy flying for its own sake - she's not really keen at all - and is brassed off with all the hassle she perceives at airports with security and waiting around in queues to board aircraft. Furthermore, you can take a lot more luggage on the train without having to bother about security issues and the train frequency is so much greater.
I'm not trying to be negative. I'm trying to point out that not everyone sees air as a huge boon when there is viable rail, or even road if you really don't like flying, on short journeys.
It would be interesting to see if there are any figures to suggest that Exeter area visitors have increased noticeably since the air route began. Somewhere like Newquay certainly benefits from its domestic air connectivity but that's much further away from most large centres of population in this country.
I agree about Air Wales. Apart from bmi baby, for whom it flew one or two routes, it had no partners and Flybe is a more enterprising animal. No criticism of Air Wales; it's just that Flybe has more resources.
I'm not sure that the prospect of a flight rather than a train will necessarily appeal to everyone by any means. The train will arrive at Cardiff city centre - the aircraft won't - and there might be a danger of us as aviation enthusiasts thinking that everyone would fly rather than go by rail if there was a choice. Lots of people, my wife included, only fly when there is no realistic alternative. Like many people she doesn't enjoy flying for its own sake - she's not really keen at all - and is brassed off with all the hassle she perceives at airports with security and waiting around in queues to board aircraft. Furthermore, you can take a lot more luggage on the train without having to bother about security issues and the train frequency is so much greater.
I'm not trying to be negative. I'm trying to point out that not everyone sees air as a huge boon when there is viable rail, or even road if you really don't like flying, on short journeys.
It would be interesting to see if there are any figures to suggest that Exeter area visitors have increased noticeably since the air route began. Somewhere like Newquay certainly benefits from its domestic air connectivity but that's much further away from most large centres of population in this country.
I agree about Air Wales. Apart from bmi baby, for whom it flew one or two routes, it had no partners and Flybe is a more enterprising animal. No criticism of Air Wales; it's just that Flybe has more resources.