My point being that the far Southwest and South Wales catchments effectively 'top up' the catchment to make BRS so successful and make those smaller demand city routes more viable. They would still work without those catchments however the growth Easyjet has seen to is it 17 aircraft now(?) might not have been possible if CWL and EXT had become more successful but smaller regional airports and retained their passengers.
I agree completely that some thinner routes at BRS only work because they are topped up by passengers from outside the airport's core catchment, notably South Wales and Devon/Cornwal, a point that I have made many times down the years across a number of aviaiton websites. These would be unlikely to work to the same degree at either CWL or EXT because (a) the core catchments are smaller and they would need more topping up than at BRS (b) CWL would not get much topping up from the EXT catchment and vice versa.
The easyJet base complement at BRS in summer 2020 should have been 18 aircraft: 10 A320s, 6 A319s, 2 A321s - thanks to
Severn for that information.
If i remember rightly there's about 2m Welsh using BRS. What I would be interested in seeing is how many of those use routes from BRS that are offered, or have the potential to be offered from CWL. Again, I dont believe many city routes would be viable from CWL, some of the main ones would, but more the holiday routes. Unfortunately no Airline is willing to take the risk, especially now.
Tim Lee once addressed that point on WAN or WAF and made the valid comment that if many of the 'Welsh' passengers using BRS were using a handful of routes there would be a strong argument for more flights to these destinations from CWL, but if they were spread across many BRS destinations then some would be thinner routes not viable at CWL. I note he still posts on the Dried Fruit under his user name there although he hasn't appeared in their CWL forum for a long time. I enjoyed reading his posts and learned a lot from them.
The CAA passenger survey published in 2008 which reflected CWL's busiest ever year of 2007 when 2.1 milion passengers were handled showed that 700,000 'Welsh' passengers still used BRS. The reason might have been some routes not viable at CWL but that's a mere supposition.
I would also like to see how the shift of city moving is having an effect on the Welsh economy. We know that once the tolls went that many people started to leave the expensive BRS property markets and move to Southeast Wales, still obviously central to both CWL and BRS, but it must've shifted things slightly to bring CWL as a viable option for many.
With populations across the UK increasing that ought to make all airports have potentially larger catchments although the population growth and movement is not evenly spread.
People from the Bristol area have been moving to south-east Wales in particular for a number of years because of lower property prices. There have been regular newspaper reports saying that Gwent estate agents report 80% of the enquiries for properties emanate from the Bristol area. Prior to COVID many were commuting to Bristol each day for work adding to the severe traffic congestion that occurs on the M4 around the Almondsbury Interchange and M32 most work day mornings.
The WG should be latching on to that and promoting Wales as a cheap place to live but easily accessible to the bigger cities. Someone on London wages living in South Wales would be laughing.
As with Bristol residents moving west to Wales in search of less expensive properties a similar move has been occurring for a number of years from London to the Bristol area for the same reason, which then puts up the price of houses in both south-east Wales and Bristol as the money cascades west.
There are regular reports about Londoners moving to Bristol and its city region (there was another article in the local Bristol press about it only this weekend) which with Birmingham seems to be the most popular destination for those moving from the capital to outside the south-east. Many then commute daily to London for work - just over an hour from Bristol Parkway, about the same journey time as Brighton to London which has been a favourite destination for commuters to the capital for many, many decades.
South-east Wales could work too - it probably already does with some.
Leaving aside nationalistic reasons there is an argument that Cardiff needs an airport more than Bristol. The latter enjoys one of the most vibrant economies in the UK despite having no long-haul air routes to its local airport (other than transatlantic sun charters). It therefore relies on LHR (and benefits from it) for its long-haul, and for some of its short-haul too even when routes are operated from BRS but at frequencies or timings that are not convenient to some business travellers.
Having no airport at Bristol would obviously be a big blow for local leisure travellers but would it really hurt the city region's economy to a marked degree? LHR is 'up the road' and other airports such as BHX, CWL and EXT around its perimeter. Cardiff, being that much further away from LHR than Bristol, might not see its economy escape so easily with no local airport.
I'm not advocating the closure of BRS, just wondering how much local airports really do add to local economies.
I'm not how turning Wales into a commuter area for London would really benefit the country and CWL. If businesses moved from London and brought high paid jobs into the area then that would be a different story but I do feel we need to be wary of turning Wales into commutersville for England.
Wales is probably already beginning to become something of a 'commutersville for England' as I pointed out above with Bristol residents/workers moving west. Mind you, it's not all one-way. I know several people personally who live in the Bristol area and travel to Wales each day to work.