I'm not actually sure Bristol pays for any money that goes to Cardiff. Wales as a country does pay a lot of tax to the UK Exchequer as well as things like water that goes to England without any formal tax on it so is essentially 'taken' from Wales. With the natural resources in Wales it could be a case of Wales being held back by the UK government. I think Bristol and the South West suffers from the same but to a greater degree because it doesn't have a regional government that can speak up for itself and have powers to raise taxes or finances to pay for things like Metro's.
I was quoting the words of the member of the former South West Regional Development Agency member about indirectly supporting Wales. In a general sense there is some disquiet amongst some people in Bristol because Bristol is the only English city apart from London that pays more into the Exchequer than it gets out. Everywhere else receives either broadly what they pay in or in some cases more than they pay in.
So in one respect the surplus the government gets from Bristol helps to give a little extra to what the government describes as deprived areas of the country - which of course is not the same thing as the Scottish or Welsh governments' block grant from Westminster. I think if other wealthy English cities also contributed a bit more than they get back the disquiet felt in Bristol would be lessened. The question posed in local business and local government circles is, "Why just Bristol?"
Well i have read that their are calls for Wales to split off and create it's own cricket board and it's own international team, whether that would've bared it from one of these franchises i do not know. In the end it is the England and Wales Cricket Board so they need to cover Wales and though there would've been protests i've no doubt many cricket fans in the area would go and see a Bristol based team. I think the problem is the lack of teams, with only 8? it's hard to please everyone, 10 might have been a better number.
I have long thought that the England cricket team should be named United Kingdom or perhaps Great Britain. Since the year dot Welsh, Scottish, Irish as well as English players have been eligible to play and have done. Also a number of Australians, South Africans, Indians and others have played for England, usually based on their parents' eligibility or residence qualifications. Welshman Tony Lewis captained England as have Scots such as Douglas Jardine (the 'Bodyline' tour of Australia in the 1930s) and Mike Denness. The great Glamorgan CCC patriarch and Welsh rugby international, Wilf Wooller, was an England cricket selector for six years from the mid 1950s. Republic of Ireland cricketer Eoin Morgan is England's current one-day cricket captain. South African Tony Greig (another sad early death - a couple of years ago) captained England in the 1970s until he was axed following his association with the Packer camp.
Ireland has very recently been elevated to test status. I don't know if it's like rugby where the team represents the whole of Ireland, or as in football where the Republic and Northern Ireland play as separate countries.
English international cricket is governed by the England
and Wales Cricket Board so there is a valid argument that the cricket team should not be just called England. I don't know if there is sufficient momentum in Wales to follow Ireland into test level status.
Blooming heck Lockal Yokel as a fellow cricket lover I was pretty much agreeing with you just pointng out what I thought the cricket authorities thinking might be in choosing Cardiff over Bristol I never inferred that Bristol was not a regional centre it obviously is as is Cardiff as well as being a capital city. It's pretty obvious that six of the chosen venues were nailed on leaving a difficult choice for the remaining two.
I am a avid Warwickshire follower, I live in Worcestershire and enjoy visits to watch both of them play when I can.
So far as government (tax payer funded) spending goes the richest area London gets the most and the poorest areas seem to get the least e.g. The northeast believe per head but it's not really an argument I wish to get into.
Sincere apologies. I misinterpreted or misread (either is possible at my age).
I used to watch Somerset many times a season in the 60s, 70s, 80s and 90s when I was a member of the club - much less so these days. Many highlights as you can imagine especially in the Golden Era of Viv Richards (I saw his first two centuries for Somerset - at Bristol v Glos and shortly afterwards at Bath v Yorkshire), Ian Botham and Joel Garner (what a delightful man - always had time for everyone), with more than useful support from the likes of Brian Rose, Vic Marks, Pete 'Dasher' Denning (sadly he died in his 50s) and Colin 'Herbie' Dredge (sounds vaguely Dickensian) who was one of many cricketing brothers from Frome and also a decent semi-pro footballer.
Warwickshire and Worcestershire I saw many times when they were playing Somerset. One game I remember was at Glastonbury, one of many venues that Somerset would play at around the county in those days. Many of the wickets were of dubious quality. (In 1953 Bertie Buse, of whom John Arlott described as having a run-up to bowl like a butler bringing in the tea, was awarded a benefit and chose the three-day county championship match against Lancashire at Bath as his benefit match. Unfortunately, the Bath wicket was its usual capricious self and Somerset were all out for 55. Lancs made about 160 before Somerset collapsed again to lose by an innings and the benefit match was over in one day).
Back to Glastonbury. It was in 1972, one of Warwickshire's county championship-winning years. The ground was little more than a field with rudimentary temporary stands for spectators. Somerset had batted on the Saturday and made about 300. Sunday was for the 40-over John Player League in those days so the second day of the county championship match was on the Monday. I watched Monday's play. I nearly didn't because my fuel gauge was playing up and I ran out of petrol en route to the match. Fortunately, I had a can and there was a nearby petrol station.
Warwickshire had the great Alvin Kallicharan in the side that day. It didn't help because on what was little more than a village pitch the visitors were bowled out twice in the day to lose by an innings. To rub salt into the wound, one of the principal tormentors was Tommy Cartwright who made a tremendous impression in his time at Somerset. These days the ECB pitch inspector would have a season ticket to visit Somerset's 'out' grounds if they were still using them.
Somerset were so cash-strapped then that they were up to all the tricks. In the 1950s when they had a permanent position at the bottom of the county championship they were playing Surrey (champions seven years in row) at Weston-super-Mare. Surrey only had to get a few runs to win in the fourth innings and Somerset obtained the Surrey captain's agreement to use an old ball in order to save a few quid. Between the wars they had a player called Tom Lowrie. Birth qualifications were applied strictly at that time. Lowrie was properly registered at Lords as 'born Wellington' (it's a small Somerset town near Taunton for those who might not be aware). What Somerset failed to make clear to Lords was that Lowrie was actually born in Wellington, New Zealand.
Sorry if I've overdone the reminiscence.