ACC meeting, Tuesday 23rd September 2025.

Unexpectedly, due to a change in schedule, Vincent Hodder , CEO, was in attendance at today's meeting.

* Passenger figures

Passenger throughput for the fiscal year to week ending 24/8/25 was 2,255,191. This compares to 2,128,316 for the same period in 2024/5.

* Community events.

Four events have been held at Otley, Guiseley, Bramhope and Cookridge. All had good attendances, 30 at Otley, 45 at Bramhope, and 30-35 at Cookridge and Guiseley. LBA consider these have been successful and despite each being disrupted by anti airport attendees who, according to other attendees on the ACC, ruined it for others who had a real interest in LBA. There are four more to come. Menston, Meanwood, Kirkstall and Baildon. Thereafter, the events will continue but changes will be made to the format- a listening event without LBA presentations, with joint action plans developed to deal with the issues raised at each meeting. Changes will also be made to the type of attendees. Efforts will be made to attract younger age groups.

My omment.....
It's clear that these events have largely been hijacked by the anti airport brigade. One attendee said he walked out of the event due to his anger and frustration at the way they behaved, preventing him and others from speaking unless it was in accordance with their views. All who attended stated that Vince Hodder did a superb presentation and showed great patience and respect for all despite the provocation.

* LBA Regeneration

In response to my question, it was confirmed that LBA management had only this morning discussed a flythrough video illustrating how the terminal will look when completed, and this is now to be commissioned, so one will be available further down the line.

Phase 1 is now fully completed other than snagging items outstanding.
Phase 2 is well underway but has another 18 months to go before completion in time for the summer season, 2027.
Phase 3, aircraft stands, has now started. The first 2 additional stands will be ready for use from February 2026. The next 2 are now under design and should commence construction next year.

Within the extension, there are currently 353 seats which are not within any bar or eatery. A further 40 are to be installed shortly.

A new AMT coffee outlet will be installed within the new extension .

Other outlets that will eventually be included within the terminal include:
- An un-named sports retailer.
- A new Montys bar.
- Pharmacy/general outlet
- A new Juniper Concept eatery/bar
- Starbucks ( slightly smaller than existing)
- A new Upper Crust outlet.
- WH Smiths and Greggs will be retained.
- A small Currency Exchange.

Note:

The Leeds United outlet was closed in order to increase the size of the Cabin Bar seating area.

The new Burger King (extension) is half the size of the old one but outsells it significantly.

The Tap and Brew has 305 seats and is the largest in the world. It also has the largest menu anywhere. Passengers can now order from general seating by scanning a QR code and the food will be brought to them. It is doing incredibly well.

Boots will remain until at least 2027. Beyond that, the pharmacy provider is unconfirmed - commercial in confidence would apply anyway. It could be Boots, or someone else.

Due to a change in the location of a goods lift, a suitable location has now been found to create an outdoor smoking area. This will be part of phase 2.

All work is currently focussed on the western end of the terminal. When that is completed, the remaining central area will be transformed to connect the two new areas together.

A councillor praised his recent experience at the airport except the Avro Lounge which he said was very poor. John Cunliffe outlined that LBA are looking at adjusting this lounge's offer and they are aware of the negative comments on line. However, he pointed out that over 50, 000 people have used this lounge and only a tiny number have complained. It was explained that this lounge is used by many card holders and the card vendors do not pay the airport sufficiently to provide the levels of service some expect. Nevertheless, they are taking the matter seriously snd looking at how to improve it.

* Parkway Station

In response to my question, Vince Hodder confirmed this project remains very much on the agenda with regular discussions taking place with the WYCA and Leeds City Council. It was a key subject that cropped up at the Cookridge Community Event. He did say there were rumours within LCC that the costs were under scrutiny due to being too high and overspending on the other new stations in Leeds, but Vince feels the quoted costs are way too high anyway, and he's adamant that the project will be going ahead.

* 5 million passenger planning consent

In response to a question relating to the need to submit a planning application no later than 12 months after reaching 4.5m passengers per annum (a section 106 condition within the scrapped 2009 terminal scheme), Vince stated that in their view, the matters covered by this condition had already been covered within the 2017 planning application and the 2019 Project Sky application, both of which were approved. They do not therefore consider that a further application has to be made as doing so would cover the same issues they've already addressed. They have written to LCC but to date not had a response.

* CLEUD outcome.

Vince provided a quick overview of the situation. The outcome of the hearing has led to confusion between both LBA and LCC as the findings didn't meet either party's expectations. Both are now involved in detailed discussions to try and find a way forward but in the meantime, the airport have issued a notice of appeal.

In response to my question, Vince stated there would be no impact on current or next years planned flying programmes, but equally there would be no growth involving night flights (ie based sircraft) unless they were QC 0.25 until such time as the issue is fully resolved. It sounded incredibly complex, totally ridiculous, and it was confirmed LBA is the only airport with night flying restrictions, that doesnt have a periodic review of what's needed. Most airports have no restrictions or, if they do, they have reviews with the planning authority every so often- 5 yearly usually. BHX is an example where they have recently reviewed night operations and secured enhanced limits due to increased demand (since the arrival of Jet2).

Whilst explaining this, Vince did say that Ryanair have indicated an enhanced flying programme at LBA to come, but all on non based aircraft. Whilst non based ops are good, they don't bring with them the same level of jobs growth that based aircraft do.


* Doncaster Sheffield Airport

In response to a question asking for his comments, Vince stated that it will have little impact on LBA as most of DSAs passengers tend to fly out of MAN and EMA, and that when it closed, LBA gained little other than Wizz. He expressed the view that it was a complete waste of money and it would never be self sustaining with few, if any, airlines interested. He repeated that Wizz have told him they have no intention of going back as most of their passengers are living in the LBA catchment. He admitted TUi may consider it, but advised that they are planning to change their methods of operation which will not improve DSAs chances. He also referred to a challenging period ahead for air travel generally. He did express annoyance though at public money being used to effectively bribe airlines to move their operations from privately funded airports, with the potential for job losses as a result. He didn't say whether there would be any legal challenge by LBA.

* Wizz Air Gdansk

The loss of this route was questioned by myself given the healthy passenger figures and it was clear the decision came out if the blue for LBA. Vince stated that Wizz are what might be described as an unstable carrier that is regularly reviewing where they want to be. They are prioritising high density routes where they can fly daily and in the case of Gdansk, (and other Polish routes) , Ryanair are making it difficult. Since Brexit, there has also been a notable reduction in the Polish population as migrant workers have returned home.

* Loganair LHR link.

This is not dead yet. LBA, Loganair and BA remain in discussions regarding a possible code share link to Heathrow. Vince did admit there were obstacles to overcome but didn't expand on that.
Great report, many thanks.
 
In response to my question, Vince stated there would be no impact on current or next years planned flying programmes, but equally there would be no growth involving night flights (ie based sircraft) unless they were QC 0.25 until such time as the issue is fully resolved.
Thanks for the report WH, very comprehensive as usual and it’s much appreciated.

In terms of the update above, did you interpret this as no more based aircraft full stop until it’s fully resolved or a case of the only based aircraft they can target are those with qc 0.25
 
Thanks for the report WH, very comprehensive as usual and it’s much appreciated.

In terms of the update above, did you interpret this as no more based aircraft full stop until it’s fully resolved or a case of the only based aircraft they can target are those with qc 0.25
The latter, although not sure how likely it is that any airlines would yet commit to operating only a NEO or MAX. Vince seemed to be hinting that as yet, airlines don't have enough of them to make such a commitment nor are they incentivised to do so due to our operating restrictions, despite favourable fees on offer.

Unfortunately, this was a topic that only came up in AOB, so the chair was keen to finish with a load of airport staff outside waiting to start another meeting at 4pm. So time was limited for both information and questioning. Maybe just as well as we could probably spend the whole meeting on it and still not fully understand the logic or implications of the CLEUD ruling.
 
With Ryanair potentially saying an enhanced program, if it was for next year then surely something would be announced soon
I noticed only yesterday, an on line YEP article about new route (not really, it was only Warsaw - the change over to Chopin from Modlin) - and increased frequency on other routes. Maybe that's it, or maybe there's much more to come next summer. Ryanair dont tend to say much until nearer the time. A lot can change over 6 months, especially with Ryanair.

One thing I think is certain. If Ryanair think Easyjet may be in the wings waiting for LBA, Ryanair will respond.
 
With Ryanair potentially saying an enhanced program, if it was for next year then surely something would be announced soon
Its usually oct into nov announcements are made, apart from the air blue rumour things are very quiet currently so hopefully something is announced next month onwards.

Regards the clued and qc 0.25 types, with the way easyjet, ryanair and jet2 are purchasing neos and maxs they will become a point a couple of years down the line where most of their fleet will be made up of these types, if the airport can get some sort of agreement on these types then id say thats a positive, whatever the case something needs to be sorted fast and this utter ridiculous situation sorted esp with 200million going into LBA, the airport cant afford to stagnate with none or low growth!
 
Post on the RYR BHX thread that FR are starting to load S26 so could definitely be a space to watch. That poster does though tend to make some very "interesting" comments generally but I believe follows overall schedules quite closely, so perhaps make of this what you will
 
Its usually oct into nov announcements are made, apart from the air blue rumour things are very quiet currently so hopefully something is announced next month onwards.

Regards the clued and qc 0.25 types, with the way easyjet, ryanair and jet2 are purchasing neos and maxs they will become a point a couple of years down the line where most of their fleet will be made up of these types, if the airport can get some sort of agreement on these types then id say thats a positive, whatever the case something needs to be sorted fast and this utter ridiculous situation sorted esp with 200million going into LBA, the airport cant afford to stagnate with none or low growth!
Im expecting an announcenent in November.
 
Further to the recent information supplied by the Yeadon Councillors, regarding LBA intending to seek a variation to the night planning restrictions, I have just received this directly from LBA. It has been issued to all ACC members so that, together with the released information by Councillors, suggests that its now in the public domain. Anyway, it soon will be. Nevertheless, I would strongly suggest that we read, digest, and say nowt, other than any discussion within our membership.

A key issue to note is that as well as the proposal to switch from the existing movement cap to an overall annual noise exposure limit, supported by a new noise insulation scheme, the proposal also changes night time hours to those sought, and approved by Leeds City Council as part of Project Sky, ie: night time hours change from 2300- 0700 to 2330-0559. This would bring LBA in line with other airports, and the average noise exposure system is stated to be in accordance with CAA and Government policy. It should also be noted, that if implemented, the 31 year old winter/summer night movement limit of 4000 per year would be scrapped completely and the overall noise exposure based on a calendar year.

Anyway, for your information. I'm unsure if this amendment to an existing planning consent counts as a planning application that enables public comment/objection/support or not. Hopefully, not. Otherwise, we will be still waiting for a decision in 6 months. Someone mentioned that the Council needs to respond within 13 weeks, but we've heard that before, haven't we?? (CLEUDs).

It's interesting this action is being taken, following a period of discussions between LBA and LCC planners on the way forward after the CLEUD outcome.
Let's hope this is seen by both parties as the way forward. We know for sure the likely reaction of they who shall not be named.

IF this succeeds, its brilliant. Big IF as ever but the Council have approved these hours before, and only an idiot would seek to prevent the airport attracting the quieter aircraft. The key issue of course, is what is this annual night noise exposure limit and how soon will LBA reach it, if airlines don't upgrade their based aircraft??


Leeds Bradford Airport

S73 Application - Briefing Note

What is proposed and Why

The proposals seek to update planning conditions which control night flights at LBA , via a s73 application of
planning permission P/07/022 0 8/FU.

LBA are currently permitted to operate a capped number of aircraft arrivals and departures during the nighttime
period of 2300 – 0700 hrs. These restrictions are over 30 years old and are therefore significantly outdated ,
presenting no incentive for airlines to modernise their aircraft fleets. They also place LBA at a competitive
disadvantage compared to other UK regional airportsto the detriment of the West Yorkshire economy.

Most UK airports benefit from an operational nighttime period which ends at 0559 hrs. This is due to standard
European flight patterns which dictate that early morning flights are necessary for the efficient operation of airports and the airlines, largely due to the ability to operate return flights in a single day .
The focus of the application is on reducing aircraft noise via a capped noise quota count system over a new
operational night-time period of 2330 – 0559 hrs . Such a system will make LBA compliant with current CAA, DfT
and government policy on aviation and will:
• Constitute a move to limits directly related to noise
• will incentivise the early adoption of quieter, low emission aircraft which the current movement based operational controls do not.
• Replace the existing summer and winter season movements limits (2,800 & 1,200 respectively) with a fixed noise quota count cap that applies annually over the calendar year to all aircraft that arrive and
depart during the 2330 to 0559 nighttime period.

Airlines need to be incentivised to base their most modern, energy efficient and quietest aircraft in locations
where their benefits can be maximised. This will also stimulate greater connectivity and support economic growth in the West Yorkshire Region, whist reducing noise and aircraft emissions.

What are the Benefits of the Proposals?

Social benefits include a reduction in the impact of noise on local communities by the introduction of a new noise
insulation scheme. The changes will also lead to enhanced global and UK connectivity and reduced surface
access journey times, as people will be discouraged from travelling to more distant airports.

Environmental benefits extend to a reduction in greenhouse gases such as CO2, a reduction in air pollution
from particulate matter and lower fuel demands by aircraft.

Economic benefits of the proposals include in excess of 5,500 new jobs, and an increase in economic output for
the West Yorkshire Region from £460m to £940m. As the vast majority of employees that workat LBA live in
West Yorkshire, these economic benefits will directly benefit the West Yorkshire Region.

Reputational benefits will see the West Yorkshire Region become a serious contender on an international scale
helping to attract greater foreign direct investment and local growth funds.

The Planning Balance

LBA are currently operating under significantly outdated restrictions which limit the number of flights during the
nighttime period. These restrictions are out of date with current CAA, DfT and government policy and place LBA
at a competitive disadvantage compared to other UK regional airports.
Passenger demand is forecast to grow and both the government and LCC support growth at LBA , so long as this
is undertaken in a sustainable manner that balances economic success with environmental protection.

Regularising the controls will incentivise airlines to base their most modern, energy efficient, and quietest aircraft
at LBA. This subsequently improves connectivity and supports further economic growth in the West Yorkshire
Region , whilst minimising noise and carbon emission effects.
Doing nothing will fail to attract these quieter and cleaner aircraft, will hinder the ability to achieve the economic
potential of LBA, and delay delivery of the environmental benefits (noise, air quality and carbon emissions).
There are a range of economic, social and environmental benefits that weigh heavily in favour of the proposals.
These will either not materialise or be significantly delayed if the controls are not modernised.
 
Thank you for sharing WH
Am sure the clown group will be wetting there beds over this
But how can this not be approved? Surely this is what has been discussed in detail with LCC and both parties have come to a agreement on what to do and how to move forward
If they previously approved the altered night hours and now refuse it’s going to make LCC look pretty stupid or even stupider than they currently are

Let’s hope easyJet are ready to occupy the 10 new stands with a base of 10 A320 neos
 

Upload Media

Remove Advertisements

Subscribe to help support your favourite forum and in return we'll remove all our advertisements. Your contribution will help to pay for things like site maintenance, domain name renewals and annual server charges.



Forums4aiports
Subscribe

NEW - Profile Posts

If anyone would like to share their local airport news right here in our news area let me know so I can give you the correct permissions to do so. It only takes a couple of minutes to upload a news story with an accompanying image. The news items can then be shared on the site homepage by you. #TakePart #Forums4airports Bring the news to one place!
survived a redundancy scenario where I work for the 3rd time. Now it looks likely I will get to cover work for 2 other teams.. Pretty please for a payrise? That would be a no and so stay on the min wage.
Live in Market Bosworth and take each day as it comes......
Well it looks like I'm off to Australia and New Zealand next year! Booked with BA from Manchester via Heathrow with a stop in Singapore and returning with Air New Zealand and BA via LAX to Heathrow. Will circumnavigate the globe and be my first trans-Pacific flight. First long haul flight with BA as well and of course Air NZ.
15 years at the same company was reached the weekend before last. Not sure how they will mark the occasion apart from the compulsory payirse to minimum wage (1st rise for 2 years; i was 15% above it back then!)
Ashley.S. wrote on Sotonsean's profile.
Welcome to the forum, I was born and bred in Southampton.

Trending Hashtags

Advertisement

Back
Top Bottom
  AdBlock Detected
Sure, ad-blocking software does a great job at blocking ads, but it also blocks some useful and important features of our website. For the best possible site experience please take a moment to disable your AdBlocker.