Future Infrastructure Developments

[LBAYORKIE]

Thanks to you and everyone else who has thanked me. I said most of what i needed to say.

 

[Aviador]

I'd like to echo other members, well done @LBAYORKIE for your efforts today you sounded very professional in your delivery to the panel.

 

[Hendi]

So thats garthwaite pushing for a delay then

 

[Sherburnflyer92]

Why?

"This paper, this paragraph" blah blah blah. Why are these councillors in charge of the council?

 

[michael]

......and I thought National Park planners were bad !!

 

[leedslad]

Why are they talking about the rail halt? That's a separate scheme?! Especially when the meeting going so long anyway ha

 

[scottrhino]

Not had chance to watch but been following the posts. Does it make Handforth Village council look professional??

 

[LBA4EVER]

All these councilors have absolutely no knowledge or understanding whatsoever, LBA management i feel have been weak today, they must get the key facts across and try bring this meeting to a conclusion, with the lack of knowledge these councilors have they have no choice but to reject the plans.

 

[Sherburnflyer92]

Why is the meeting adjured for the 3rd or 4th time today? /

It is no 20:30 7 hours after. What the hell? Have a few objections, few supporters, experts in field, airport it self then vote.

 

[Hendi]

There on to comments now surely a decision must be soon?

 

[dmrodgers]

All these councilors have absolutely no knowledge or understanding whatsoever, LBA management i feel have been weak today, they must get the key facts across and try bring this meeting to a conclusion, with the lack of knowledge these councilors have they have no choice but to reject the plans.

Meeting adjourned for 5 minutes, restarting at 8.30pm. Would agree with LBA4EVER, the airport have not pushed there side of the case hard enough and the new Airport Director in his speak appeared weak reading parrot fashion off a script. No where I have I heard the airport saying this not expansion but redevelopment of the terminal. Only very rarely have I heard about the previously approved planning application which would give the same overall result but in an unfriendly way. The airport needs to be proactive with its case otherwise this is going to be rejected.

 

[gavin1980]

Its excruciatingly embarrassing. You'd think it was the first time the topic had ever been discussed

 

[Sherburnflyer92]

Don't think councillor Campbell gets that you need a new terminal first before you remove the old one. Christ these people are thick.

Highly visible to who? Cookridge, who, live in view of the airport regardless.

 

[Sherburnflyer92]

Is the chair not going to move this rather mundane person on who is recycling things which should of been discussed at 2pm this afternoon.

 

[Sherburnflyer92]

Do these people seem to forget that the council owned the airport 20 years ago? This is there doing. God I've got a god damn good list of who will be receiving an email and what they will get after this. This dipstick been the first on the list.

 

[Aviador]

Having watched the previous meetings, I don't believe there has been any change in views from councillors. There are one or two councillors that appear to be missing and their views are little known if they are still taking part.

 

[leedslad]

Campbell seems for (with conditions)

 

[Hendi]

A condition of they can dictate which aircraft can land and take off with the new flying hours

 

[LBA4EVER]

Wow after 3 meals and 7 and a half hrs the meeting is still going on!

 

[Hendi]

Yeah did I just hear he just said he can't support it on to the next one?