David_itl
Well-Known Member
- Jan 31, 2016
- 2,089
- 193
- 58
ORD offers so many more connections and a wide body would offer a better experience for the premium pax.
To me, the most surprising statement I've seen elsewhere is the choice of routes to Europe on offer out of ORD by AA in winter. There is LHR (no surprise) and MAN. That's it. It beggars belief that AA seems to think that the only way they can get passengers from Europe to Chicago is routing them over BA connecting services. As I posted on that site:
"Even AA's 788 experiment on the ORD-MAN was an unmitigated disaster. Frequent delays and cancellations and the replacement of the 788 with 763s due to the unreliability of the 788 can only lead to a lack of confidence in booking any flight with them out of the regions.
As for Brexit, can anyone please tell Thomas Cook that this should mean fewer passengers going across the Atlantic as that's the mantra we've been told. Continuous expansion by them and now up to 7 destinations in the States with number 8 in San Diego odds on for a launch (the local newspaper ran a large feature on what do to in that city on the pretext on flights being available "shortly"). They are not too proud to turn away economy passengers - far better to have 3 passengers paying $500 rather than hope 1 passenger wants to cough up $1500 for any perceived benefits paying for business class."
I can understand getting a legacy carrier to operate on 4 weekly and above frequency to the States but I do wonder if may be more beneficial for BHX for the likes of Norwegian to operate up to 3 weekly to 6 or 7 destinations in the States?
Last edited: