A little article i came across of an interview with Tony Hallwood, Leeds Bradford Airport director.

[textarea]District would see a significant benefit if flight duty is axed, says Leeds Bradford Airport boss


2144023.jpg



Scrapping the so-called ‘flight tax’ would boost Yorkshire’s economy and the region’s international links by levelling the playing field with European aviation competitors, according to Leeds Bradford Airport’s marketing chief.

Tony Hallwood, LBA commercial director, has backed calls for the Government to abolish Air Passenger Duty in the light of a new report which claims the move would generate a net tax gain for the Treasury and create nearly 60,000 new jobs.

Duty of between £26 and £184 is levied on each passenger on every flight, depending on the distance travelled.


Since January 2007, APD has increased by up to 260 per cent for short-haul flights and up to 360 per cent for long-haul.

Mr Hallwood said: “Leeds Bradford Airport welcomes this report as we have long been calling for APD to either be abolished and significantly reduced in order to make us more competitive with other European countries and to boost Yorkshire’s economy and connectivity with international markets.

“Removing this tax would enable us to fly to more places and generate economic activity, which would generate income for the Treasury through other taxes. It would be a virtuous circle.”

2298414



The study by business advisers PwC was commissioned by four major UK airlines into the economic impact of APD. It used a model favoured by Chancellor George Osborne and used by the International Monetary Fund, World Bank and some governments.

It found that abolishing APD would boost UK GDP by 0.46 per cent in the first year, with continuing benefits up to 2020. The boost to the UK economy would amount to at least £16 billion in the first three years and result in almost 60,000 extra jobs over the longer term.

PwC said abolishing APD would pay for itself by increasing revenues from other sources such as income tax and VAT. This net benefit, even after allowing for the loss of APD revenue, would be almost £500 million in the first year.

It suggests that the economic boost would come from extra investment by airlines to expand their networks, and investment by other aviation businesses to support this growth. Scrapping APD would also bring a net increase in inbound tourism, which counts as an export for the UK economy.

Increased business travel through better connections would also improve productivity and create employment.

The study describes APD as a “substantial business cost” of about £500 million a year for UK businesses.

The report states: “Abolishing APD has the potential to reduce the cost of flying, making it cheaper for businesses to maintain relationships with overseas customers. In this sense, APD could be regarded as a tax on exports.”

Tony Hallwood added that several European countries had either abolished or significantly reduced flight taxes and seen the resultant economic benefits and boost to aviation and business activity.[/textarea]

Article here
 
A little gripe of mine. Why do they use out of date pictures to illustrate the article? Must be two years since Eastern A/W had 2 J41's at LBA.
 
Sorry Concorde Lover, my gripe is with the article authors, I realised it was their picture.
 
http://www.travelweekly.co.uk/Articles/ ... ittee.html

This week the Commons Transport Select Committee has made a number of demands of the government in its aviation policy, including APD.

In summary it wants:

1. The government to carry out an objective analysis of the impacts of introducing differential rates of APD.

2. An APD ‘tax holiday’ for a 12-month trial period for new services operating out of airports outside the southeast.

3. A fully-costed study of how far APD impacts on the UK economy with the caveat that if it provides clear evidence that the duty causes harm to the economy or government revenue APD should be significantly reduced or abolished.
 
[textarea]MAG backs campaign to scrap Air Passenger Duty

Airport bosses have thrown their weight behind a fresh campaign calling for a controversial passenger tax to be scrapped.

Air Passenger Duty is passed on to travellers through ticket prices and it has been blamed for airlines choosing to launch flights from European airports instead of those in the UK.

Manchester Airports Group has estimated as many as 2,000 jobs could be lost if APD is not overhauled and has asked the government to consider not applying the levy to new long haul services until they are up and running.

MAG has backed the A Fair Tax on Flying campaign, which is urging businesses to sign a petition pushing for a government re-think.

Full Story: http://www.manchestereveningnews.co.uk/ ... ir-4692437[/textarea]
 
[textarea]Business leaders unite against APD

Travel industry bosses are among 250 UK chief executives, managing directors and board members to have signed a new petition calling for a government re-think on Air Passenger Duty.

They tell chancellor George Osborne today that the air tax is a “significant additional burden” on British businesses.

The petition says that APD is “too high” and calls on the government to undertake “urgent action to reduce the world’s highest air passenger tax”.

Signatories include Heathrow chief executive Colin Matthews, Virgin Atlantic chief executive Craig Kreeger, British Airways chief executive Keith Williams, Travelzoo UK managing director Joel Brandon-Bravo, Statesman Travel Group managing director Mervyn Williamson, Bristol airport chief executive Robert Sinclair and Manchester Airports Group chief executive Charlie Cornish.[/textarea]

Full report at: http://www.travelweekly.co.uk/Articles/ ... t+apd.html
 
[textarea]Give us power to scrap airport passenger duty

AIR passenger duty should be scrapped to help Scots travellers and airports, the SNP conference has heard.

Delegates at the party's annual conference in Perth approved a motion calling for the UK Government to hand over power of APD to the Scottish Parliament to allow Holyrood to scrap it.

The conference heard Scottish airports lose two million passengers a year because of the charges.

Paisley MSP George Adam, whose neighbouring constit-uency includes Glasgow Airport, said Glasgow needs to attract more direct routes but APD was preventing airlines from locating at the airport.

He said: "The airport is a catalyst for investment in the area, but APD costs two million passengers a year. That cannot continue.

Read more: http://www.eveningtimes.co.uk/news/give ... n.22455941[/textarea]
 
[textarea]Aviation 'must play part in deficit reduction'

Aviation minister Robert Goodwill has stressed that the sector must continue to play its part in the government’s deficit reduction plans.

He was speaking at the end of a Westminster debate on aviation strategy prompted by a report in May by the Commons transport committee which called for expansion of Heathrow.

His comments came a day after Treasury minister Nicky Morgan ruled out abolishing Air Passenger Duty on the basis it would not be sensible for the UK's economic recovery.

Goodwill repeated his backing for the growth of regional airports “and we recognise the importance of regional air connectivity to London in supporting regional economies and contributing to national cohesion".

But Goodwill added: “Aviation is a challenging topic. Successive governments have struggled with how best to continue to gain the economic benefits it brings while restraining its impact on local people.”

He claimed that the government has established the right foundations “to move forward, gain consensus and secure the benefits aviation brings for the nation”.

The Davies commission is to produce an interim report by the end of the year on airport capacity but will not deliver its final recommendations until after the next General Election in 2015.

Labour MP and transport committee chairman Louise Ellman called for decisive action and accused Parliament of having “shied away” from whether to allow additional airport capacity in the south-east.

“That is a prime example of a failure to recognise our infrastructure needs,” she said. “The Davies commission will produce an interim report at the end of this year with recommendations for immediate action to improve the use of existing runway capacity over the next five years, as well as a short list of options to address capacity over the longer term, but the commission’s final report will not be published until after the general election in 2015.

“We must act decisively on this issue before we lose our competitive edge as a global hub for aviation.

“The commission must provide a robust and independent evidence base for future decisions, as well as recommendations for action.

“The failure to take a decision has consequences for the UK because it puts our competitiveness and economic success at risk.

“When the Davies commission reports, it will be time to decide, and that will be the challenge for the 2015 Parliament.

“I hope that today’s debate assists the House in identifying the key issues so that a conclusion that is in the interests of the UK can be reached.”

Labour MP Graham Stringer called for a ‘APD holiday” for three years to allow airports with spare capacity such as Manchester, Birmingham and Bristol to attract more long haul routes from India, China and Thailand.

Read more: http://www.travelweekly.co.uk/Articles/ ... ction.html[/textarea]
 
[textarea]WTM 2013: APD rise 'will adversely affect industry'

Seven out of ten senior industry executives attending World Travel Market predict that a rise in APD next year will adversely effect the industry, according to WTM's annual report.

A further 65% said it will deter foreign tourists from coming to the UK.

APD is set to rise again next year, taking the highest APD cost up to £388 from £376 for a flight more than 6,000 miles in first class.

Air Passenger Duty was introduced in 1994 on outbound flights fm the UK, with a £5 rate for UK/EU flights and £10 for everywhere else.

Stephen Sackur, who was presenting the findings of the WTM industry report, said consumers were becoming "very sensitive" over APD.

He said: "A third of UK holidaymakers say they won't even consider a long-haul flight because it is too expensive because of APD and four out of ten, 39%, will only consider short-haul flights which won't experience a rise in APD next year."

Read more: http://www.travelweekly.co.uk/Articles/ ... finds.html[/textarea]
 
[textarea]APD lobby group urges Chancellor to take 'decisive action' ahead of Autumn Statement

Chancellor George Osborne is being urged by an industry lobby group to take “decisive action” to limit the economic impact of Air Passenger Duty.

A Fair Tax on Flying has submitted evidence to the Treasury ahead of December’s Autumn Statement illustrating the damage that the current levels of APD are having.

Read more: http://www.travelweekly.co.uk/Articles/ ... ement.html[/textarea]
 
[textarea]Industry dismayed by APD rise go-ahead

The industry has reacted with dismay that increases in Air Passenger Duty scheduled for April 2014 will continue to go ahead after no mention of the tax was made in the Chancellor's Autumn Statement.

The A Fair Tax of Flying campaign group voiced disappointment that there was no sign of reform of APD in George Osborne's comments despite ongoing lobbying efforts.

Abta chief executive Mark Tanzer said: “It’s disappointing that the Chancellor has once again chosen not to conduct a proper review of APD.

Read more: http://www.travelweekly.co.uk/Articles/ ... ahead.html[/textarea]
 
[textarea]Northern airports will suffer if Scotland votes for independence, says IAG's Walsh

English holidaymakers will change their travel plans and travel north of the border to avoid flight taxes if Scotland votes for independence, according to International Airlines Group chief Willie Walsh.

If Scotland breaks away from the union he expects to see passengers favouring flying from airports in a newly independent nation to avoid Air Passenger Duty charged by the Westminster government.

“Absolutely without question it will happen,” IAG chief executive told The Telegraph, dismissing claims that APD represents only a fraction of a flight’s cost.

“It is that much money to avoid that it is a factor. Anyone who thinks otherwise is a fool,” said Walsh.[/textarea]

Full article at: http://www.travelweekly.co.uk/Articles/ ... walsh.html

In the full article NCL is mentioned specifically.

The Sunday Times carried an article the weekend before last suggesting that all three main political parties would offer greater tax powers, including APD and vehicle excise duty, to Scotland if a No vote was the result. If this is so Wales would also be likely to be offered similar powers.

The way things are going, even if Scotland remains in the UK, it will be given powers over all sorts of things as will Wales (a report today recommended Wales be given responsibility for many aspects of justice including its police forces to go with additional taxation powers already offered - though not APD as yet) which means the Westminster parliament will be more and more the de facto government of just England but MPs representing Welsh, Scottish and Northern Irish constituencies will still have a vote on matters that purely affect England - the so-called West Lothian Question.

The chancellor who sets English APD rates (if Wales and Scotland set their own, as N Ireland does) could actually be from a Welsh or Scottish constituency as were Brown and Darling in recent times.
 
I think Newcastle has benefited substantially over the years from Scottish customers seeking cheaper flights from South of the border.

I'm not convinced airlines will offer cheaper flights from Scotland if they do vote for independence. The extra flying time to Scotland from the majority of European destinations will inevitably incur additional fuel costs in comparison with airports South of the border. Even if airlines did benefit from lower taxes or charges it wont necessarily lead to cheaper airfares, but more likely lead to airlines holding back money to maximise their profits.

In any case I am intrigued at how the pro independent Scotland camp intend to pay for all these tax and spend give -a-ways when the UK government is unable to pay for these things at present. Did the Jacobite clan have a secret pot of gold they hoarded away through the centuries waiting for this moment?
 
I'm not convinced airlines will offer cheaper flights from Scotland if they do vote for independence. The extra flying time to Scotland from the majority of European destinations will inevitably incur additional fuel costs in comparison with airports South of the border. Even if airlines did benefit from lower taxes or charges it wont necessarily lead to cheaper airfares, but more likely lead to airlines holding back money to maximise their profits.

I agree that with short haul (under 2,000 miles) the UK APD rate of £13 per person for the lowest rate of travel would not in itself be a game changer if Scotland (and perhaps Wales) were given the power to set their own APD and reduced it to zero.

However, long haul could be a different animal.

From 1 April this year APD on journeys of 2,001 miles and above will attract the following rates with the reduced rate (ie lowest class of travel - usually economy) shown first in each case followed by the standard rate (ie other than the lowest rate of travel).

2,001-4,000 miles £69/£138

4,001-6,000 miles £85/£170

Above 6,000 miles £97/£194

Assuming all other airline costs from a Scottish (or Welsh) airport and a competing English regional airport were broadly similar, if an airline flying to the Middle East added half the UK ('English') APD rate to its fare from a zero-rated Scottish (or Welsh) airport that would bring it in over £10,000 each time if it sold an average of 300 tickets per flight. It would still be able to reduce its overall ticket price by about £35 per person from Scotland (Wales). A saving of nearly £140 for a family of four would be an attraction to many. If an airline didn't help itself to a slice of the zero APD in the hope of attracting more passengers then the zero APD from Scotland (Wales) would give our family a saving of nearly £280.

Premium customers would save even more.

I know that this is a theoretical example and that other charges (extra fuel etc) would come into the equation but I do think that the likely huge disparity in l/h APD rates would have an airline thinking seriously when deciding to fly from Scotland (or Wales) or from an English airport in the general vicinity. I'm certainly not suggesting that major long haul airlines will up sticks from the likes of LHR or even MAN and migrate to Scotland (or Wales) but where, say, UK regional long haul charter or regional niche long haul scheduled routes are concerned devolved APD might well be an important factor.
 
I take your point about long haul but given how difficult it already is to get airlines to establish long haul services even from well established airports like Manchester, I don't really see it happening. I do see any new Scottish government getting itself stuck with all the new promises it keeps making.
 
APD has been reformed so that all long haul flights are now capped at band B.

This means flights from UK to the far east and the likes are now going to be the same rate as the USA, with up to £30pp cut off APD. When there are UK airports vying for China flights, and Air Asia X publicly stating that APD stopped them opening Manchester, means it should help kick start some new routes, especially with the new route fund announced, which I have since learned is for any non-London airport.
 
.....................means it should help kick start some new routes, especially with the new route fund announced, which I have since learned is for any non-London airport.

This seems to be an extension of the existing Regional Air Connectivity Fund set up last year in order to help ensure that regions outside England’s new high speed rail network also benefited from stronger transport links.

It now seems the fund can be used for start-up help with new routes from regional airports. However, unless a lot more cash is to become available the fund's original £10 million a year budget won't go very far.
 
[textarea]Call for 'unfair holiday tax' Air Passenger Duty to be scrapped


The TaxPayers' Alliance is today calling on the Government to abolish Air Passenger Duty.

The campaign groups calls it "Britain's unfair holiday tax" and is launching a week-long campaign with a protest at Bristol Airport later today.

At today's planned protest at Bristol Airport, from noon until 1.30pm, Jonathan Isaby, TaxPayers' Alliance chief executive, is expected to say: "Britain's punitive taxes on flights, now the highest in the world, are an incredible burden on families who have saved up for a well-earned break in the sun.[/textarea]

Full report at http://www.westerndailypress.co.uk/unfa ... story.html
 

Upload Media

Upgrade Your Account

Subscribe to help support your favourite forum and in return we'll remove all our advertisements. Your contribution will help to pay for things like site maintenance, domain name renewals and annual server charges.



Forums4aiports
Subscribe

NEW - Profile Posts

Seems ĺike been under construction for donkeys years!
Jon Dempsey wrote on HPsauce's profile.
Hi, I was born and lived in B36 for a long time - Lindale Avenue, just around the corner from Hodge Hill Comp.
I just noticed your postcode on a post.

Do you still live in the area?
survived a redundancy scenario where I work for the 2nd time
If you’re tired of takeoffs, you’re tired of life.
49 trips undertaken last year. First done this year which was to North Wales where surprisingly the only slippery surfaces were in Conwy with the castle and it's walls closed due to the ice.
Aviador wrote on SNOWMAN's profile.
Thanks for the support @SNOWMAN

Trending Hashtags

Advertisement

Back
Top Bottom
  AdBlock Detected
Sure, ad-blocking software does a great job at blocking ads, but it also blocks some useful and important features of our website. For the best possible site experience please take a moment to disable your AdBlocker.