ACC minutes for meeting held on 24 July 2019
I’ve summarised below the main points in the minutes. A number of other items were also discussed such as passenger statistics, aircraft movements, public transport use, airport service quality results etc. As is the way with the minutes these days no details were given, merely a reference to the fact that ACC members had received written reports on these subjects.
The main points as I see them are listed below. The full minutes can be accessed at
Learn more about how we engage with stakeholders in the local community and beyond through the Airport Consultative Committee. View meeting agendas and minutes, Government guidance and related group information.
www.bristolairport.co.uk
1. The chairman suggested that consideration should be given to altering the ACC’s constitution to permit members of the public to address the committee for up to three minutes. Members supported this in principle and the chairman would circulate a proposed form of wording for consideration at the next meeting. In the meantime the current constitution would remain in place.
My comment:
The BRS ACC is more conservative (note the small c) in its approach to including members of the public than some other airport ACCs. The chairman says on the airport website that meetings are ‘generally open to the public and we welcome interest in what we do” However, the section goes on to say that anyone wishing to attend must write to the ACC secretary in advance and provide details of name, organisation represented and the reason for wishing to attend the meeting.
That doesn’t strike me as an ‘open house’ type of invitation and there is also the implication that a would-be attendee must represent an organisation rather than be merely an interested private individual. Furthermore, if my experience is anything to go by, attempting contact via the ACC email address on the airport website is ignored. I await the result of the consideration at the next ACC meeting which was actually on 23 October but no minutes are yet available for that meeting.
2. The CEO presented a written report which had been circulated with agenda papers. He drew particular attention to:
Passenger numbers
Airport Service Quality
Carbon ‘road map’
Sustainable improvements (security trays made from recycled plastic and water refill stations were two examples he gave)
Passenger experience improvements yjay have been completed including extension to immigration area, check-in facilities, capital projects such as completion of multi-storey car park, two new aircraft stands, ongoing construction of Aviation House and a new route to Brussels
Proposed airspace change
My comment:
That’s all the minutes provide - just a summary of the CEO’s written report
3. The airport planning manager spoke of the planning application currently residing with North Somerset unitary authority to increase annual throughput from 10 million to 12 million passengers. Since submitting the application in 2018 the airport has responded to requests for further clarification/information including a formal request relating to an Environmental Impact Assessment. The consultation period was closed.
In response to a question, it was confirmed that airport management was not proposing any additional aircraft stands.
In response to another question airport management confirmed that they remained committed to the second multi-storey car park but could not provide a timescale at present and that the demand for low cost parking needed to be met.
My comment:
I don’t know if the comment about additional aircraft stands means no more after those to be built on the site of the proposed demolition of the old terminal or whether that proposal has now been cancelled. Bear in mind that these are minutes of a meeting held four months ago.
Even if the new stands on the old terminal building site are still to go ahead, can the airport really cope if it proposes no more stands after that and is allowed to handle 12 mppa?
4. The airport’s surface access strategy manager reminded the committee of the work of the parking summit and 8-point action plan to address parking issues with three core elements: developing an authorised waiting area and drop-off facility; implementing local parking controls by working with Winford parish council and the local authority; implementing enforcement including contributing to a dedicated parking officer.
My comment:
As these minutes are four months old I assume the authorised waiting and drop-off area is the one now open on the south side of the airport.
5. The airport’s consultation and engagement executive gave a presentation on Airspace Modernisation which is a commitment by the government and the CAA to make journeys quicker, quieter and cleaner. The Future Airport Strategy Implementation (South) programme covers 15 airports in the south of the UK.
6. The airport’s head of sustainability gave a presentation on the airport’s carbon ‘road map’ - the airport plans to reduce those Scope 1 and Scope 2 carbon emissions under the airport’s control to become a zero airport. He drew particular attention to the airport’s carbon footprint and action taken to date to to reduce direct emissions - e.g. solar panels, electric vehicle fleet, low energy lighting and other unspecified initiatives, with future ambitions mentioned such as biofuel.