We do.....
Aer Lingus (DUB)
Air France (CDG)
Air India (DEL)
Brussels Airlines (BRU)
Emirates (DXB)
KLM (AMS)
Lufthansa (FRA/MUC)
Qatar (DOH)
Saudia (JED)
Scandinavian (CPH)
Swiss (ZRH)
Turkish (IST)
For an airport that handled 11.5m pax last year, I think the amount of national/hub airlines that operate and sustain year round at BHX is pretty damn impressive. There are airports of equivalent size in the UK and Europe that would kill to have such airlines serving them year round alongside a robust number of competing Low-Cost bases.
Yes BHX is far from perfect, and i would love it if Aegean would have stayed, but i love the way that when an airline pulled out of BHX, people are so eager to blame BHX and jump on the "its our catchments that's the issue". Sometimes that is the case, but just as many times its not. Take Aegean as an example. To remove BHX/LGW services will immediate effect screams more to do with the airline than BHX... even when RYR drop a route, they at least give notice and let the route run to the end of a season.
Its a great shame that Aegean have not been able to make BHX-ATH work for them, but lord, do we have to re-run the same conversation everytime. The airline industry is a fickle business - this will happen again in the future, but then we other airlines will join.