White Heather
Elite Pro-Member
If there is not to be any physical extension to the runway, then the only alternative is to configure the existing concrete to provide an increased usable distance. At the 32 landing end that could be achieved by moving the threshold back to where it originally was and adjusting the glideslope accordingly. There would also need to be changes to the approach and runway lighting. Moving the threshold back would require a dispensation which would seem unlikely to be granted or re-profiling the land at the end of the runway to provide the required 'protection' (in case of undershoot) for the threshold. Approaches would be a bit lower which in itself will cause negative reaction from some neighbours.
I would not class any of these options as 'navigational' enhancements so am still intrigued as to what is meant.
With regard to height of approach, it would surely be possible to increase the approach angle to 3.5 degrees, the same as on runway 14, which would result in aircraft being higher on approach. The net result would probably be that they would be roundabout the same height as they are now on finals but able to land a couple of hundred metres closer to the end of the concrete. Returning the touch down point to where it used to be prior to the runway extension was often mentioned as an option by the previous airport owners, but Bridgepoint have always been quite negative about it. I am intrigued too therefore. One thing is certain - something needs to be done.