Leeds Bradford - General Thread

[LBAYORKIE]

I think you should redact the above comment and appologie to White Heather @BCFC as it is potentially breaking the forum rules.

To further answer the question. The airport has basic images from the original planning application they could use prior to them agreeing on specific internal renders or design as mentioned. The basics of the building could be advertised. It looks like when they do show the public, they intend to show them more high quality CGI renders similar to the ones shown for check-in hall A.

Im sure Ive seen artists impressions of

Are the plans in the public domain ? can you post a link ?

Im sure Ive seen artists impressions of the extension- werent basic plans available for a public consultation?
I assume the council must have had the plans for the planning application and they were available to the public. I understand the internal layout of the terminal has not been finalised but images of that csn come later

Are the plans in the public domain ? can you post a link ?

Given the plans are in the public domain its strange they are reluctant.

Im sure Ive seen artists impressions of the extension- werent basic plans available for a public consultation?
I assume the council must have had the plans for the planning application and they were available to the public. I understand the internal layout of the terminal has not been finalised but images of that can come later

 

[White Heather]

Im sure Ive seen artists impressions of

Im sure Ive seen artists impressions of the extension- werent basic plans available for a public consultation?
I assume the council must have had the plans for the planning application and they were available to the public. I understand the internal layout of the terminal has not been finalised but images of that csn come later



Im sure Ive seen artists impressions of the extension- werent basic plans available for a public consultation?
I assume the council must have had the plans for the planning application and they were available to the public. I understand the internal layout of the terminal has not been finalised but images of that can come later

Just to clarify this, the external features of the building which were given planning approval will be the same as originally shown in 2017, as changing them would require another planning application. However, the interior layout, and what is provided within it, has been reviewed and revised by current airport management.

We know from previous discussions that the previous CEO, Hywel Rees, was not impressed with this 2017 scheme, so it's not really surprising that the current CEO, Vince Hodder, has opted to make changes.

Furthermore, in the previous scheme, then second phase (a refurbishment and reconfiguration of the existing terminal after the new extension is completed), was not part of the scheme. It was just a job for the future to do when needed and funding was available. Under this revised scheme, my understanding is that it IS part of the scheme and will follow on from the extension, being part of the project. Unless of course the airport have made further changes since their last update.

What the airport intend is to finalise and sign off the internal design changes before providing any information into the public domain. When they do, hopefully it will include a virtual tour as last time. The material released to the media will have to be done professionally by specialists so will take a while to put together . The final outcome will hopefully be impressive.

 

[Finger66]

If I knew how we could put a poll on here I would asking whether WH should carry on posting. I bet there would be very few, if any, in the no vote. Mine would certainly be yes

Personally I am not sure he/she has been misinterpreted as there have been a few fairly detrimental posts recently. But what is done is done. Let's all move on and get back to celebrating the exciting changes that are coming for our beloved LBA

 

[dmrodgers]

This is getting like the Leeds United manager saga with post flying all over social media. Lets just take a step back and wait till the airport have something positive to report. I'm sure when the details are finally released and work commences we will have an airport to be proud of and we can finally sing the praises of Yorkshire's Airport.

 

[LBA4EVER]

Just to clarify this, the external features of the building which were given planning approval will be the same as originally shown in 2017, as changing them would require another planning application. However, the interior layout, and what is provided within it, has been reviewed and revised by current airport management.

We know from previous discussions that the previous CEO, Hywel Rees, was not impressed with this 2017 scheme, so it's not really surprising that the current CEO, Vince Hodder, has opted to make changes.

Furthermore, in the previous scheme, then second phase (a refurbishment and reconfiguration of the existing terminal after the new extension is completed), was not part of the scheme. It was just a job for the future to do when needed and funding was available. Under this revised scheme, my understanding is that it IS part of the scheme and will follow on from the extension, being part of the project. Unless of course the airport have made further changes since their last update.

What the airport intend is to finalise and sign off the internal design changes before providing any information into the public domain. When they do, hopefully it will include a virtual tour as last time. The material released to the media will have to be done professionally by specialists so will take a while to put together . The final outcome will hopefully be impressive.

Good to hear from WH that once the extension is complete the second phase is to reconfigure and refurbish the existing building, was hoping this was part of the plan and should make a really big difference.

 

[HX3]

I for one one am looking forward to the plans being released by the airport. I’m sure they will have taken time to consider future needs, especially in light of planning restrictions.
As enthusiasts, we are often impatient, but we just need to let things pan out and allow the airport to formalise their plans, and in the meantime we need to remain respectful of each other and our differing views and opinions.
White Heather, as others have mentioned, your sharing of information from the consultative meeting is very much appreciated and valued, so I hope that you will continue to share with the group, as the majority really value your input.

 

[ls27]

It is always good to hear what WH has to say. I think one or two seem to think that she should tell us all the things that are going on. She indeed does tell us what she can. But be aware that she HAS NO OBLIGATION to tell us anything.

 

[JRP]

Am not one to complain, but today I went up to LBA for the first time in a good few years and parked up on Yeadon Moor Road, where the crash gates are overlooking the airfield, the road is in a terrible state massive pot hole etc, so if anyone goes up there please be careful with your car, I have also filled a report in on the LCC web site as I assume with emergency access required here the road should be kept up to a standard, i be grateful others could buy a few reports on to the council only takes a couple of minutes on the portal
I then had a walk with the dog along the public footpath towards the 32 end, the path that runs between the golf course and the boundary fence, it’s in good path but it is very boggy and full of water at the far end so if anyone goes up there some sensible footwear required, have also filled in a report to the council on this as I guess that public footpaths even if off road ones need to be kept accessible, but not sure what the rules are on this if anyone knows let me no please
All this needs is a few dozen wheelbarrows of hardcore and the path will be more accessible
Anyway was good to get up LBA

 

[ls27]

The public footpath is in the hands of the Parks and Leisure dept (Or it's successor). It is a Public Highway. As a matter of interest Leeds City Council is the Highway Authority (and not the Highways Department) and can delegate such things to any department. The Highway Authority has a statutory duty to maintain a smooth and safe surface free of obstruction of most highways.

 

[LBAYORKIE]

Positive reporting from 'the wharfedale/ilkley gazette'

PICTURE GALLERY: Sea of smiles at Yeadon's 'Happiness' Carnival

Yeadon Carnival, which this year had the them of 'Happiness' took place on Saturday and there were seas of smiles.

www.ilkleygazette.co.uk

The public footpath is in the hands of the Parks and Leisure dept (Or it's successor). It is a Public Highway. As a matter of interest Leeds City Council is the Highway Authority (and not the Highways Department) and can delegate such things to any department. The Highway Authority has a statutory duty to maintain a smooth and safe surface free of obstruction of most highways.

The footpath has been like that for years. The last time it received any attention was about 1970 when they laid a deep layer of smooth pebbles- which is definitely not the right surface, you simply sink in it. I suspect the 'authorities' don't really want the footpath to be used for security reasons. Crash gate access should be a priority though.

 

[The Pole]

Anyone know why the exit from 1 hour drop off is left only meaning you are supposed to head back towards airport and do 180 on roundabout to head back to Scotland Lane if you live in horsforth? I suppose its to keep traffic on main roads. But us locals know better!

 

[White Heather]

Anyone know why the exit from 1 hour drop off is left only meaning you are supposed to head back towards airport and do 180 on roundabout to head back to Scotland Lane if you live in horsforth? I suppose its to keep traffic on main roads. But us locals know better!

No idea. Doesn't seem to be any good reason other than to discourage the use of Scotland Lane, as you suggest.

Perhaps they're hoping that some drivers will accidentally turn left towards the terminal, end up in the drop off area, and have to pay to get out!

 

[Aviador]

Anyone know why the exit from 1 hour drop off is left only meaning you are supposed to head back towards airport and do 180 on roundabout to head back to Scotland Lane if you live in horsforth? I suppose its to keep traffic on main roads. But us locals know better!

It won't matter when our crazy council has stopped cars from using Scotland Lane. Thats the crazy alternative to the airport link road if I remember correctly.

 

[White Heather]

It won't matter when our crazy council has stopped cars from using Scotland Lane. Thats the crazy alternative to the airport link road if I remember correctly.

Don't worry, we will still be able to use Scotland Lane, as long as you're walking or cycling to catch your flight!

 

[Aviador]

It's called "disconnecting Leeds"

 

[Len Fish]

Don’t get me started about Leeds traffic mismanagement!

 

[The Pole]

Don't worry, we will still be able to use Scotland Lane, as long as you're walking or cycling to catch your flight!

Haha there was a couple at the junction with white House Lane and Scotland Lane yesterday pulling cases behind them!

 

[LBAYORKIE]

I wasnt aware if this.

https://www.yorkshirepost.co.uk/news/politics/rachel-reeves-to-contest-tory-held-seat-in-risky-move-after-boundary-change-4177708

 

[Snackbar]

At least the airport will no longer be represented by Alex I hate LBA Sobel! https://www.wharfedaleobserver.co.u...new-mp-boundary-shake-up-splits-constituency/

 

[Sherburnflyer92]

At least the airport will no longer be represented by Alex I hate LBA Sobel! https://www.wharfedaleobserver.co.u...new-mp-boundary-shake-up-splits-constituency/

Cannot wait to see the back of the anti working class, anti small business, anti anything with common sense prick. Goodbye. Make sure the door hits you so hard on the way out you get concussion.