Future Infrastructure Developments

[lbaspotter]

And if anyone is wondering what BREEAM means take a look at this website, Explains everything.

Certification for Sustainable Buildings | BREEAM

Get trusted BREEAM certification for sustainable buildings. Improve asset value, ESG alignment, and environmental performance across global projects.

www.breeam.com

BREEAM is the world’s leading sustainability assessment method for masterplanning projects, infrastructure and buildings. It recognises and reflects the value in higher performing assets across the built environment lifecycle, from new construction to in-use and refurbishment​

​

BREEAM does this through third party certification of the assessment of an asset’s environmental, social and economic sustainability performance, using standards developed by BRE. This means BREEAM rated developments are more sustainable environments that enhance the well-being of the people who live and work in them, help protect natural resources and make for more attractive property investments.​

​

 

[XEROX]

A bit more on BREEAM, extract taken from internationalairport-review highlighting some of the build technologies used at the world's first BREEAM excellent rated airport terminal - Oslo

"The multi-disciplinary design team applied an holistic approach to sustainability, including the harvesting of as much on-site energy as possible. Snow from the runways will be collected and stored during wintertime in an on site depot to be used as coolant during the summer. Natural materials have been used throughout the building: the new pier is entirely clad in timber sourced from Scandinavian forests. Recycled steel and special, environmentally friendly, concrete mixed with volcanic ash has been used throughout. By choosing environmentally friendly materials, the building’s CO2 emissions were reduced by 35%.

Enhanced levels of insulation mean the project has achieved Passive House level performance standards. Energy consumption in the new expansion has been cut by more than 50% compared to the existing terminal.

Passenger comfort and well-being have been key drivers of the design throughout. Artificial lighting is designed only as a minimal supplement to high levels of natural daylight, and can be set to reflect different moods according to weather, season and time of day. The compact layout of the building, transparency and open spaces enhances visual legibility and wayfinding, providing reassurance and peace of mind for travellers. A panoramic window at the north end of the pier, a 300-metre long skylight and curved glazed windows on both sides open up the view to the surrounding landscape and beyond.

Green walls and water features, suggestive of Scandinavian forests enhance the experience for passengers as they move through the terminal. The retail units in duty free areas have been conceived as organic stone forms associated with Norwegian landscapes"

 

[Aviador]

Anyone else notice the airbridge attached to the terminal building in one of the renders. With such a big investment one would hope there are at least three of them.

Now looking back to my post in the thread showcasing the previous proposals, it's clear the airport has listened. So to all those NIMBY and neigh sayer's out there, be careful, very careful what you wish for because if you scupper the airports plans for this world class terminal the airport still has planning approval for this

 

[XEROX]

Anyone else notice the airbridge attached to the terminal building in one of the renders. With such a big investment one would hope there are at least three of them.

Now looking back to my post in the thread showcasing the previous proposals, it's clear the airport has listened. So to all those NIMBY and neigh sayer's out there, be careful, very careful what you wish for because if you scupper the airports plans for this world class terminal the airport still has planning approval for this

The airport owners are being politically astute. In this current green climate, by going down the BREEAM route and ensuring the new terminal will be 'green' and in adherence to UK policy for net zero Co2 emissions, they check-mated the council and environmentalists. Surely what basis can the council give for not passing this proposal?

 

[Finger66]

This is all potentially great and epic news. Seems to be some good early support coming out of Westminster so let's hope that makes it harder for any possible objections from LCC and the ill informed and pathetic greenies

 

[oldendays]

I'd be interested to know what David Laws makes of all this, publicly or privately. I believe he is still employed by AMP.

 

[White Heather]

I think that bearing in mind the council in Leeds already approved a far less satisfactory extension which did little to help LBA cut its emissions and which was to enable up to 7m passengers per annum, there is absolutely no logical reason for them to now reject this plan which is infinitely better. The revised plan does not seek to go beyond the 7m passengers already approved yet delivers a world class terminal facility - something that even the local councillors all recognise has been long needed. If they turn this down, then they are just not fit to be in office in my view and their reckless decision will have a negative impact on Leeds, the Leeds City Region and beyond for decades to come. This is what the airport and the city has needed for many years and surely Leeds Council will recognise the fact that LBA has an owner that is prepared to invest £150m in the airport, which amounts to a free investment in the city and city region too. This isn't just about Leeds, and I am sure that Bradford and the rest of the LBA catchment area will be wanting this to be approved. Yes, climate change is a problem but no, air travel isn't going to just go away. We still need an airport that is fit for purpose now and into the future and developing one that will be carbon neutral by 2023 whilst hugely enhancing the passenger experience is exactly what is needed. Leeds City Council should be jumping for joy at this proposal.

 

[KARFA]

We have a great news day and still people find stuff to complain about.. unbelievable Jeff!

I give in, may as well just become a nimby.....

I am certainly not complaining and have expressed my happiness at the news already elsewhere. I am very pleased AMP are prepared to invest a substantial amount of money and not do just another minor improvement to an existing terminal which is not really fit for purpose anymore

 

[Aviador]

@Offint Lets walk before running. Getting the terminal right is pivotal for the future of Leeds Bradford Airport. Worrying about what Leeds City Council does to enable passengers to get to LBA is another subject entirely, but lets let them worry about that, it's their mess.

 

[KARFA]

I find it hard to imagine that getting off a train and onto a bus even with a family and suitcases is a "pain in the arse". People do it all the time when travelling, you take the car to the Long Stay car park and jump on a bus to get to the terminal, you may well do it at the other end when picking up the hire car. The buses themselves are equipped to allow easy movement of cases and bags and then you are dropped off right outside the terminal... what could be easier? And it is free! Ideally a train that goes right into the terminal, eg Stansted, is preferable but we have to live in the real world.

I agree. A short bus journey is fine as long as the buses are timed well to connect to the trains.

 

[ls27]

Good heavens. Has anybody had to walk from the railway station at MAN to get to the Jet2 departures. It takes a long time and is like a maze. I did it with my partner in 10 mins and at the speed we walk it equates to about 3/4 mile. and we are both in our 70s. No problem.

 

[Aviador]

In the interests of keeping this topic about Infrastructure, Construction & Developments such as the terminal proposals everyone needs to keep on topic. We have a Road, Rail & Access Issues - Thread where proposals about rail and road access can be discussed to your hearts content.

 

[Jetchaser]

Fantastic news and glad I have joined this forum just as the most exciting development in the airports recent history could be happening. Like everyone here, I really hope this happens and with AMP already agreeing the money is there, I think there is every chance it will get built.

My only surprise seeing this announced on local news and hearing it on radio is we got no comment from LCC. Usually when huge infrastructure announcements are made, there is comments from LCC, maybe Judith Blake etc. Be interesting to see if we hear something in the next day or so from them,.

 

[lbaspotter]

Also the old terminal is still present in the images, does that mean it becomes an arrival terminal?

In the official Airport press release and in the interviews that the Airport's CEO took part in (BBC Look North & ITV Calendar News & Leeds Live) yesterday it was categorically stated that the existing 1960's designed and built terminal would be knocked down.

I'm guessing the old terminal appears in the said images as they show what the airport will look like once the terminal swap takes place, ie new terminal opens & the old one is closed!

Because what would the need be for a 2nd terminal?

 

[Sherburnflyer92]

There wouldn't be a need @lbaspotter. Does that mean the old terminal could be made into additional stand parking if they level out the terminal front area too?

Also what would happen with Jet2's HQ, the cargo area and that security channel?

Didn't they also build a fuel farm where they now plan to build a terminal?

 

[lbaspotter]

Agree all good questions @Sherburnflyer92, I guess we will find out more when more detailed drawings and layout plans are submitted to Leeds City Council planning department in the Spring

I'd love to know what happens to the ATC Control Tower & if the Fire Station is been moved?

Also what do our home based airline Jet2 make of all these proposed changes?

 

[Bigman]

I must admit it was funny reading this thread in the pub with Aviador last night while he was on the Jack Daniels and I was on the Bowland Brewery Deer Stalker. This certainly has stimulated a lot of opinion!!

 

[LBA4EVER]

Its all become very exciting up at LBA and a real refreshing change from the doom and gloom of last year! Whats plaguing my mind though is the sheer amount of money AMP are looking to spend, Its certainly a massive jump from the planned £12million terminal (now scrapped) to this brand new one where AMP is looking to spend upto £150million! When you look at the plans for this new terminal at a guess id say the new terminal and the piers would cost somewhere in the region of £25-40 million? Im aware they will be other plans such as relocating the control tower, knocking down the old terminal etc but £150million is a big amount! I guess the meeting next week will shed more light on things though.

 

[LBA8098]

I believe the initial spend was for £25m which included the eastern extension plus reconfiguration of the existing terminal. But yes, still a substantial leap.

 

[lbaspotter]

To be fair I should have also mentioned if i use Car or get a Taxi its 10 mins max via Rodley, Ring Road, Horsfoth and Scotland Lane (Off peak). It can take up to 20-25 mins if the is (Peak Time) traffic at Rodley trying to go right onto the Ring Road.

Maybe some of these last few posts need moving over to the Road, Rail & Access Issues Thread. Remembering how to do it as a Moderator is another question? lol