believe on this been granted is to for the airport to plant more trees. The sensible councillors argued that to do that would need to be away form the airport due to the birds etc. If they were to do it near the airport, plant more trees, attract more birds, it could end up been worse for the climate given the need to divert and potentially dump fuel after a bird strike. I'm not sure what area is chosen yet but somewhere in North Leeds would be good.
I’ve read your points and the user above you and I agree with both of you.

I know about the trees in the plans and when they were talking about that in the meeting I had some concerns about it at first as it could attract lots of animals specifically birds which isn’t great for planes. But liked when they questioned them being close as if they are further away it’s less likely the birds will fly onto the airfield. And yes I know there is people at the airport who have the responsibility to keep birds away but they can’t keep all of them away at the same time when there’s lots of them flying across the airport.
 
I disagree that part of the terminal will be built on undeveloped land. Part will be on apron which is already there and the rest on an area that basically forms part of the long stay car park. A few trees will go on the embankment between the apron and car park, but other than that the entire development is within the confines of the car parking area and within airport owned land. The access road from any rail station on the other side of Scotland Lane is not part of this as application and will never be classed as airport owned.
 
It may be that green belt land remains just that even if there is previous development on it, so any new development on it is still subject to green belt rules, hence the reason the application and Council approval had to go to Jenrick.
 
Or is it an extension to the apron space, remember in the eyes of some any tarmac or concrete surface on an airport is runway.
Further reading suggests that may well be the case although the exact nature of the work has not been revealed. Either that or it’s for the red carpets!
 
Guess the newquay runway is pretty wide though.
According to SkyVector NQY runway width is 45 metres and LBA 46 metres, a width found at a number of UK airports.
 

Upload Media

Remove Advertisements

Subscribe to help support your favourite forum and in return we'll remove all our advertisements. Your contribution will help to pay for things like site maintenance, domain name renewals and annual server charges.



Forums4aiports
Subscribe

NEW - Profile Posts

survived a redundancy scenario where I work for the 3rd time. Now it looks likely I will get to cover work for 2 other teams.. Pretty please for a payrise? That would be a no and so stay on the min wage.
Live in Market Bosworth and take each day as it comes......
Well it looks like I'm off to Australia and New Zealand next year! Booked with BA from Manchester via Heathrow with a stop in Singapore and returning with Air New Zealand and BA via LAX to Heathrow. Will circumnavigate the globe and be my first trans-Pacific flight. First long haul flight with BA as well and of course Air NZ.
15 years at the same company was reached the weekend before last. Not sure how they will mark the occasion apart from the compulsory payirse to minimum wage (1st rise for 2 years; i was 15% above it back then!)
Ashley.S. wrote on Sotonsean's profile.
Welcome to the forum, I was born and bred in Southampton.
Seems ĺike been under construction for donkeys years!

Trending Hashtags

Advertisement

Back
Top Bottom
  AdBlock Detected
Sure, ad-blocking software does a great job at blocking ads, but it also blocks some useful and important features of our website. For the best possible site experience please take a moment to disable your AdBlocker.