You only have to look at the route and the total destruction of Woodlands, prime farming land, ponds, streams etc, and all for a train that will be another 10 years away before any journeys can start.
Only last week it was confirmed that the 225mph speed would not be achieved, and journeys were to be reduced from 18 per hour, down to 10 per hour.
I could go on, but suffice it to say, the whole project is flawed and it has already been well stated that it will never make a profit.

And do you think about all the wildlife that gets killed every year getting sucked up into a planes engine when you go on your summer holidays to Spain ?

Hs2 have done some brilliant things to put back area's for wildlife and if everybody else did there little bit for local wildlife, birds and other animals would be thriving.

You only have to look at the route and the total destruction of Woodlands, prime farming land, ponds, streams etc, and all for a train that will be another 10 years away before any journeys can start.
Only last week it was confirmed that the 225mph speed would not be achieved, and journeys were to be reduced from 18 per hour, down to 10 per hour.
I could go on, but suffice it to say, the whole project is flawed and it has already been well stated that it will never make a profit.

It wasn't confirmed, it is purely scare mongering by people like yourself against Hs2, Loooooooooooooool
 
Sorry, but most of your statements are factually incorrect.
1. Runway extensions do not even touch the amount of land being decimated by HS2.
2. You talk of 'a vocal minority who protest'. In all my research over the last 12 years I have found hardly anyone in favour of the project.
3. Victorian railways didn't take away the huge swathes of land that HS2 appears to require.
4. Replanting the thousands of lost trees has already proved a waste of time, as the vast majority are already dead. Creating natural areas alongside a high speed railway spells death to most living creatures.
5. Birmingham city centre is dying a steady death as more people avoid it at all costs.
6. The spiralling cost of HS2 is going to fall on our future generations.
 
And do you think about all the wildlife that gets killed every year getting sucked up into a planes engine when you go on your summer holidays to Spain ?
In truth, very few animals (usually birds) are killed by ingestion into aircraft engines. For a more representative comparison of land use, it would probably be better to compare the building of HS2 with that of a motorway. The M40 would probably be a good example, as it matches the first phase of HS2 i.e. between Birmingham and London.
Only last week it was confirmed that the 225mph speed would not be achieved, and journeys were to be reduced from 18 per hour, down to 10 per hour.
18 per hour? surely that can't be right. Even 10 per hour seems excessive. If the 10 per hour included both north and south bound services, that would still equate to a departure every 12 minutes.
For the record, I'm 100% in favour of HS2. People often say how good the railways of France and Japan are, but when we try to build something as good, some people want it killed off. My only concern, is that the trains that will run on it are unlikely to be designed and built in the UK. Something we used to be a world leader at.
 
18 per hour? surely that can't be right. Even 10 per hour seems excessive. If the 10 per hour included both north and south bound services, that would still equate to a departure every 12 minutes.
18 per hour was the planned number of total departures from London split between all the destinations served by the two legs of HS2 to Manchester and Leeds. Obviously this proposed number has fallen now that the Govt have downsized Euston and started chopping bits off the HS2 proposal. However, most of those cuts could be easily be reversed while the line is still being built.
 
HS2 is one of those things that whether you are for or against it, no matter what arguments you lay out, you're unlikely to convince someone on the other side of the debate to change their mind about it.

My only concern, is that the trains that will run on it are unlikely to be designed and built in the UK.

I believe when companies bid for the rolling stock contract, it was either one of the requirements or at the least very much put them in the preferred pool of candidates.


Major boost for UK train-building as HS2’s state-of-the-art fleet of 225mph (360km/h) high speed trains will be built by Alstom and Hitachi Rail at their factories in County Durham, Derby and Crewe.
 
Sorry, but most of your statements are factually incorrect.
1. Runway extensions do not even touch the amount of land being decimated by HS2.
2. You talk of 'a vocal minority who protest'. In all my research over the last 12 years I have found hardly anyone in favour of the project.
3. Victorian railways didn't take away the huge swathes of land that HS2 appears to require.
4. Replanting the thousands of lost trees has already proved a waste of time, as the vast majority are already dead. Creating natural areas alongside a high speed railway spells death to most living creatures.
5. Birmingham city centre is dying a steady death as more people avoid it at all costs.
6. The spiralling cost of HS2 is going to fall on our future generations.

5. Birmingham city centre is dying a steady death as more people avoid it at all costs.

You sound like a Birmingham Mail/Live reader. Maybe you need to get out more and have a walk around the city centre. As a resident of this great city, I confirm it is booming despite all the negativity that comes out of our local rag and its readers.
 
Last edited:
3. Victorian railways didn't take away the huge swathes of land that HS2 appears to require.
Looking online, it appears that over 8000 miles of railways were built in the UK during the Victorian era (1837 -1901), with 6000 miles available in the first half of the 1800's -

This will have taken up much more land than HS2 and in Victorian times, I doubt that they were planting new trees for those which were cut down.
4. Replanting the thousands of lost trees has already proved a waste of time, as the vast majority are already dead.
'Replanting' of trees does not imply digging them up and planting them elsewhere (which would kill most of them). It refers to planting saplings to replace the trees cut down on the HS2 route. There is no reason why 'the vast majority' would already be dead. Planting saplings is a very successful method of introducing new trees.
 
Sorry, but most of your statements are factually incorrect.
1. Runway extensions do not even touch the amount of land being decimated by HS2.
2. You talk of 'a vocal minority who protest'. In all my research over the last 12 years I have found hardly anyone in favour of the project.
3. Victorian railways didn't take away the huge swathes of land that HS2 appears to require.
4. Replanting the thousands of lost trees has already proved a waste of time, as the vast majority are already dead. Creating natural areas alongside a high speed railway spells death to most living creatures.
5. Birmingham city centre is dying a steady death as more people avoid it at all costs.
6. The spiralling cost of HS2 is going to fall on our future generations.
I welcome your views. Don't get me wrong us planners do listen, contrary to keyboard warriors on social media who think we do not and listen to no one but themselves.

The point is this: we admire what our forefathers did, we use it oblivious to the destruction they caused, but destroy they did. Future generations will be oblivious to the destruction of HS2 and they will admire what was created in its place.

Noone with any sense replaces and old tree with an old tree. Saplings will grow faster than a semi mature tree, so saplings are what are planted.l not mature trees.

People complain about too many roads. A country of this size should not have internal air travel - except possibly to the Islands. So HS2, 3 4 or 5 is the future. Sorry for those most immediately effected, but a minority object (research suggests a maximum of 15%) so we go with the majority.

Ever used the TGV? Well it is amazing, sustainable and brought long term environmental benefit. And how they did it...well you will be salivating at how democratic we do things in this country.

As planner have to, think long term and you will start seeing things from a brand new perspective.

But you are free to have your views, and we do listen. Cheers
 
One for Brum X here. I was watching Airport Action Live on YouTube, from BHX and in the background, there is a huge crane. Going by the runway alignment, I would guess it to be North or NNE of BHX. Any idea what it's doing?
52696873958_e63b330a81_k.jpg
 
One for Brum X here. I was watching Airport Action Live on YouTube, from BHX and in the background, there is a huge crane. Going by the runway alignment, I would guess it to be North or NNE of BHX. Any idea what it's doing?
52696873958_e63b330a81_k.jpg

Thanks Kevin, just asking a few peeps. Will report my findings shortly
 
Great news peeps, first crane has arrivaed at One Eastside, which will be Birmingham's tallest and biggest tower ever built.

View attachment 27929

View attachment 27930
Blimey. Photo one the crane arrives. Photo two it is built! Great to see.

One for Brum X here. I was watching Airport Action Live on YouTube, from BHX and in the background, there is a huge crane. Going by the runway alignment, I would guess it to be North or NNE of BHX. Any idea what it's doing?
52696873958_e63b330a81_k.jpg
Looks like it is in the Castle Vale area. Assuming that the woodland on the horizon is the Kingfisher Country Park.
 
Last edited:
Thanks Brum X. All is progressing well. Southside skies getting very congested.

This was on the BBC a few days ago:


46 storeys. It is going to look impressive so close to the Octagon.

 

Upload Media

Remove Advertisements

Subscribe to help support your favourite forum and in return we'll remove all our advertisements. Your contribution will help to pay for things like site maintenance, domain name renewals and annual server charges.



Forums4aiports
Subscribe

NEW - Profile Posts

All checked in for my flight to Sydney from Manchester via Heathrow. Been waiting for this trip for nearly a year and now tomorrow I'll finally head to Australia and New Zealand!
If anyone would like to share their local airport news right here in our news area let me know so I can give you the correct permissions to do so. It only takes a couple of minutes to upload a news story with an accompanying image. The news items can then be shared on the site homepage by you. #TakePart #Forums4airports Bring the news to one place!
survived a redundancy scenario where I work for the 3rd time. Now it looks likely I will get to cover work for 2 other teams.. Pretty please for a payrise? That would be a no and so stay on the min wage.
Live in Market Bosworth and take each day as it comes......
Well it looks like I'm off to Australia and New Zealand next year! Booked with BA from Manchester via Heathrow with a stop in Singapore and returning with Air New Zealand and BA via LAX to Heathrow. Will circumnavigate the globe and be my first trans-Pacific flight. First long haul flight with BA as well and of course Air NZ.
15 years at the same company was reached the weekend before last. Not sure how they will mark the occasion apart from the compulsory payirse to minimum wage (1st rise for 2 years; i was 15% above it back then!)

Trending Hashtags

Advertisement

Back
Top Bottom
  AdBlock Detected
Sure, ad-blocking software does a great job at blocking ads, but it also blocks some useful and important features of our website. For the best possible site experience please take a moment to disable your AdBlocker.