LBAYORKIE
Elite-Member
- Dec 30, 2009
- 3,848
- 233
Did they happen?Possible inbound diverts shorty
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Did they happen?Possible inbound diverts shorty
Looks it positioned back to Leeds, as the Ryanair to Gdansk has just departed at 1940, operated by a Buzz aircraft.Ryanair from Gdansk diverted to EMA
Yes looks to be heading our way. Inbound from Inverness.LPL seems to be open now - looks like Loganair INV ATR42-500 on its way in
Getting a bit of practice in then.Yes looks to be heading our way. Inbound from Inverness.
If they are, then the gurus who deal with the arrivals and departures board on the website need to get their act together, as apparently, flight code LOG (Loganair) is LOT Polish Airlines!Getting a bit of practice in then.
Just watched the Buzz MAX from Sofia, heading into LPL. FR24 showed it was originally diverting to EMA which isnt great for passengers. LBA would have made more sense. In the end it got into LPL .Shame we haven't seen much more diverts so far. BHX seems to have taken a lot. Weather over hear looks perfect.
Apologies for quoting this 3 times - it appears Virgin have acquired an A990!Looks like the Finnair is heading to EMA. Let's hope for a little bit more at least
Also looks like MAN open again and VS A330 from ATL now on approach there
Also looks like MAN open again and VS A330 from ATL now on approach there
Also looks like MAN open again and VS A330 from ATL now on approach there
I believe most people agree with your comments about the perception of the airport and the need for better technology to handle the aircraft movements due to the location of the airfield. The infrastructure has hopefully been resolved for the coming years with the opening of the new terminal this Spring and the refurbishment of the old terminal over the next 12 months or so. I think we all know the airfield needs a number of improvements but all this comes at a cost, we are never going to be able to change the direction the wind blows but the runway needs work together with improvements to the ILS as witnessed these last few days as aircraft have been unable to do a CAT3 landing due to snow. It is also good to hear that the airport has a programme for new aircraft stands which are needed if we are to reach the 7m passengers p.a. target. Ideally when the runway is resurfaced the hump should be removed but this will never happen due to cost and would also necessitate closure of the runway for days on end. This could have been done years ago when we had few flights, impractical nowadays even in winter as our 'little airport on the hill' has a large number of winter flights comparable with similar sized airports in the UK. We all know an extra 300m extension to the runway would be more than adequate to resolve a lot of the issues and allow larger aircraft to operate, however this would cause issues with the glideslope,the ILS system currently in use, if we could just get rid of the chevon then all the issue could be resolved. As technology improve year on year perhaps we may be able to overcome these issues, however it all comes down to money.It feels like the reputation of LBA is tard so badly diversions to LBA are rarely even a consideration.
If LBA is to claw its way out of this, it needs to change the reality to be able to change the perception. New equipment, better technology and be super efficient. The current investment will help to some degree but additional measures will need looking at. That's my view. I know not everyone will agree.
Subscribe to help support your favourite forum and in return we'll remove all our advertisements. Your contribution will help to pay for things like site maintenance, domain name renewals and annual server charges.