- Thread starter
- Admin
- #2,801
Fair play to them. I can't see them lasting if I'm honest. Again though, it highlights the need for LBA's renewal as early as it is possible.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Well you need to ask why LBA management haven't engaged with them to expand the route network. I suspect though that MME management will be subsidising the operation in some way.It’s just sad that have plumped for an airfield with no major cities near it and have put flights on to places such as CWL, IOM and LCY. A real kick in the teeth to LBA if you ask me, as we have been crying out for these routes for years. Honestly, can you see Eastern keeping a 1 plane base at LBA when they will have 3 based up the road?
Sure it does not harm the papers profile when northern articles now displayed on Sky paper review and the BBC paper review.A great report by the Yorkshire Post. Let's hope they continue with more of a supporting attitude towards LBA.
Teesside airport is owned by the local authority. The Mayor of Teesside funding for the operation.Given the economy in Tees valley I doubt they will be getting any public funding. More likely that the parent company of Tees Airport have done a canny deal with Eastern. Remember Tees is squashed between two AMP owned airports ...Newcastle and Leeds....so they must feel threatened.
Given the economy in Tees valley I doubt they will be getting any public funding. More likely that the parent company of Tees Airport have done a canny deal with Eastern. Remember Tees is squashed between two AMP owned airports ...Newcastle and Leeds....so they must feel threatened.
Yeah remind me who owns Teeside Airport?
No definitely not. especially not In Leeds/Bradford's case we have an owner in AMP Captial who look to be willing to invest in a lot of money.I'm not sure about the point your trying to make here LBAspotter? Are you saying that bringing private public transport back into public ownership is the way forward?
The problem with the climate change activists is that they only see want they want and ignore the effect on the rest of the world and what it may lead to.
People want to fly from LBA. Assuming they live close to LBA, they will have to travel further to an airport that offers the flight they want, so increasing carbon emmisions. Or am I seeing it too simplistic?
It's not about special notebooks but the ability in the modern age to travel. Take all modern forms of transport away and you still couldn't save the planet or reverse the damage done by mankinds presence on the planet. All mankind can do is minimise the damage it does from now on and stopping an airport like Leeds from having a few extra flights isn't going to make a difference in the grand scheme of things.Proper gammonathon this thread. Ruin the planet so you can carry on putting numbers in your special notebooks. Pathetic.
Proper gammonathon this thread. Ruin the planet so you can carry on putting numbers in your special notebooks. Pathetic.
Proper gammonathon this thread. Ruin the planet so you can carry on putting numbers in your special notebooks. Pathetic.
Subscribe to help support your favourite forum and in return we'll remove all our advertisements. Your contribution will help to pay for things like site maintenance, domain name renewals and annual server charges.