Maybe the issue for LBA/B777 is the lack of trained staff.

They may have all the equipment here, but Im sure LBA787 said that his training had been postponed? If his training was postponed, Im assuming all training was?

Before people say 'well get staff over from MAN', the staff at MAN have their own flights to cover, so easier to accept the flight there and be 'slightly overstretched' than be understaffed completely and spread staff thinly on the ground. Even for an airline like PIA, better the pee off pax with bad service on one flight rather than 2 sets of them.

Also, some airport have issues with having ground staff that are not on their airside pass count. Im not sue LBA has this issue, but could also be a factor
 
user001 said:
Maybe the issue for LBA/B777 is the lack of trained staff.

They may have all the equipment here, but Im sure LBA787 said that his training had been postponed? If his training was postponed, Im assuming all training was?

Before people say 'well get staff over from MAN', the staff at MAN have their own flights to cover, so easier to accept the flight there and be 'slightly overstretched' than be understaffed completely and spread staff thinly on the ground. Even for an airline like PIA, better the pee off pax with bad service on one flight rather than 2 sets of them.

Also, some airport have issues with having ground staff that are not on their airside pass count. Im not sue LBA has this issue, but could also be a factor

Lack of trained staff??? Its just a bigger plane to disembark passengers from, clean, restock and board passengers, other than from a technical point of view, should the plane have an issue what is the difference? That would be like a bus station saying sorry cant accept a double decker coach, we are only used to single decker 50 seaters!!

Rant over! I think its a PIA issue not LBA
 
Lack of trained staff??? Its just a bigger plane to disembark passengers from, clean, restock and board passengers, other than from a technical point of view, should the plane have an issue what is the difference?

I think you are looking at it far too simply.

First off, you need to be trained soecifically on that aircraft for the following:

Tug driver: 3 axle bogey infamous for scrubbing up loose concrete for starters. Its longer so need to have better space awareness.

Dispatcher/TRM: Needs jetbridge or steps training. Higher off tarmac and bigger doors than A310.

Cleaners: More needed for a larger aircraft. Not aware of any specific training needs.

Baggage: Im assuming need training on how to load and balance the holds.

Cant think of what else is needed off the top of my head, but I get the feeling Ive missed something off too.
 
user001 said:
Lack of trained staff??? Its just a bigger plane to disembark passengers from, clean, restock and board passengers, other than from a technical point of view, should the plane have an issue what is the difference?

I think you are looking at it far too simply.

First off, you need to be trained specifically on that aircraft for the following:

Tug driver: 3 axle bogey infamous for scrubbing up loose concrete for starters. Its longer so need to have better space awareness.

Dispatcher/TRM: Needs jetbridge or steps training. Higher off tarmac and bigger doors than A310.

Cleaners: More needed for a larger aircraft. Not aware of any specific training needs.

Baggage: Im assuming need training on how to load and balance the holds.

Cant think of what else is needed off the top of my head, but I get the feeling Ive missed something off too.


Pushback is not a primary issue, one big enough to do so is, whether we have it im not sure unless its a present one that can handle a heavier/bigger a/c.

Wont fit on an airbridge stand at lba and even if it did ASU are responsible for training in its use no dispatcher is air bridge trained its done by ramp techs or ASU if called upon. Plus the airbridge has settings for the a/c type.

Baggage handlers already trained in the use of ULD's and the balancing comes from a load sheet from the dispatcher from load controll from another load control.

Simple requirement is more staff and more space.
 
SAT 13th's service has also been cancelled. And yes they always did mention the fact that fire cover would need to be increased at the time of its operation however i don't know whether that is in terms of staff or another appliance.
 
Cat 9 fire cover is required for the Boeing 777, that's additional staffing requirement but it would usually be accommodated with 24 hours notice so I suspect there's other issues at play here.
 
EBC-S9 said:
user001 said:
Lack of trained staff??? Its just a bigger plane to disembark passengers from, clean, restock and board passengers, other than from a technical point of view, should the plane have an issue what is the difference?

I think you are looking at it far too simply.

First off, you need to be trained specifically on that aircraft for the following:

Tug driver: 3 axle bogey infamous for scrubbing up loose concrete for starters. Its longer so need to have better space awareness.

Dispatcher/TRM: Needs jetbridge or steps training. Higher off tarmac and bigger doors than A310.

Cleaners: More needed for a larger aircraft. Not aware of any specific training needs.

Baggage: Im assuming need training on how to load and balance the holds.

Cant think of what else is needed off the top of my head, but I get the feeling Ive missed something off too.


Pushback is not a primary issue, one big enough to do so is, whether we have it im not sure unless its a present one that can handle a heavier/bigger a/c.

Wont fit on an airbridge stand at lba and even if it did ASU are responsible for training in its use no dispatcher is air bridge trained its done by ramp techs or ASU if called upon. Plus the airbridge has settings for the a/c type.

Baggage handlers already trained in the use of ULD's and the balancing comes from a load sheet from the dispatcher from load controll from another load control.

Simple requirement is more staff and more space.

Thanks for the info, I know times have changed and health and safety is now at the top of everyone's agenda, however, remember back to the 80's when we got the Wardair 747 and DC10s also the day in 1996 (EUROS) we have several large aircraft and once when most of the UK was fog bound other than LBA and we had that many diverts the aircraft were parked everywhere, so I am sure LBA would manage. If the fog issue ever happened again would LBA have to turn away 777's and the like due to lack of training?
 
The aircraft is A310, AP-BEC

LBA have stated publicly that they are all set for the 777 and have been since before the 13th when the first 777 was due, so there should be reason at all for a 777 to divert to MAN unless it was to be the 777-300.
 
user001 said:
Maybe the issue for LBA/B777 is the lack of trained staff.

They may have all the equipment here, but Im sure LBA787 said that his training had been postponed?

I was supposed to be trained how to open and close Boeing 777 doors. As the only fixed training rig is at LHR my training was to be done during the turnround of the morning emirates 777 at Manchester but was cancelled when PIA told the company they were delaying the introduction of the a/c.

Shame...

:crazy:
 
planespotter1333 said:
Well todays PIA775/776 Rotations are cancelled! Is that due to lack of a/c/A310 Going tech in ISB?

Can someone tell me why its canceled !

It's due to a shortage of A310 a/c. The Leeds flight will be operated by a 777 from Manchester.

:crazy:
 
Well I'm not at all surprised, I think we all knew it was going to happen sometime soon after last weeks last minute rethink.
PIA are in a right mess with half there current fleet grounded, they really need to sort these problems out quickly.

What makes this even worse is the fact that its been operated by a Boeing 777-200ER, AP-BHX which could use LBA without problems. Meanwhile the airport FID's are showing today's flight as "cancelled", What a load off tosh as we all know it should showing "Diverting to Manchester"
 
lbaspotter said:
Meanwhile the airport FID's are showing today's flight as "cancelled", What a load off tosh as we all know it should showing "Diverting to Manchester"

You know what the airport is like when it comes to diversions to Manchester, we all know in the past they have put cancelled on a few flights even though they diverted to Manchester.
 
Flight Radar has the info down as the 777 coming to LBA, we live in hope, wonder if we might get a fly past :LOL:
 
Cant help but feel that LBA is getting strung along by PIA now. This saga with introducting the T7 seems to have gone on for years. When they say it will operate the aircraft then doubt is cast within weeks. The airport say they are now equipped to deal with the aircraft. Now with a golden opportunity it goes to MAN. If it is down to training then why arent the ground staff given the training well before hand anyway in preparation. This should have been done months ago. Why is is that Teesside (sorry DTV) can handle the 777. The runway is almost the same length as LBA. They have hardly any flights and staff these days but yet seem quite capable of handling the aircraft when it does the trooping flights. Where do they get there extra staff/fire cover etc from. Can only see PIA pulling out in the not too distant future but this will hopefully open the door to a more commited operator.
 

Upload Media

Remove Advertisements

Subscribe to help support your favourite forum and in return we'll remove all our advertisements. Your contribution will help to pay for things like site maintenance, domain name renewals and annual server charges.



Forums4aiports
Subscribe

NEW - Profile Posts

If anyone would like to share their local airport news right here in our news area let me know so I can give you the correct permissions to do so. It only takes a couple of minutes to upload a news story with an accompanying image. The news items can then be shared on the site homepage by you. #TakePart #Forums4airports Bring the news to one place!
survived a redundancy scenario where I work for the 3rd time. Now it looks likely I will get to cover work for 2 other teams.. Pretty please for a payrise? That would be a no and so stay on the min wage.
Live in Market Bosworth and take each day as it comes......
Well it looks like I'm off to Australia and New Zealand next year! Booked with BA from Manchester via Heathrow with a stop in Singapore and returning with Air New Zealand and BA via LAX to Heathrow. Will circumnavigate the globe and be my first trans-Pacific flight. First long haul flight with BA as well and of course Air NZ.
15 years at the same company was reached the weekend before last. Not sure how they will mark the occasion apart from the compulsory payirse to minimum wage (1st rise for 2 years; i was 15% above it back then!)
Ashley.S. wrote on Sotonsean's profile.
Welcome to the forum, I was born and bred in Southampton.

Trending Hashtags

Advertisement

Back
Top Bottom
  AdBlock Detected
Sure, ad-blocking software does a great job at blocking ads, but it also blocks some useful and important features of our website. For the best possible site experience please take a moment to disable your AdBlocker.