Oh dear It looks like there were some serious problems with the latest PIA service from Islamabad that diverted into Manchester on Saturday night due to the strong cross winds as news reports have started to appear in the local rag in Bradford. In my book at least the Capitan did decide to return his aircraft back to Leeds/Bradford with his passengers onboard! I suppose you can't please everyone now-a-days?

Source: http://www.thetelegraphandargus.co....A_flight_is_diverted_to_Manchester/?ref=var_0
 
If PIA were not granted permission to disembark their passengers and had already used up the food supplies on board, I don't see what they could do really, other than send out for a takeaway! It seems to be another classic case of poor communications, with people leaving LBA to go to MAN, only to find that they should have gone home and then gone back to LBA later. My philosophy is that if the flight is diverted, wait at the original airport, as the airline is responsible for getting passengers back there. As we saw in this case, there is no guarantee that if a flight diverts, it won't come back later still with the passengers on board.
 
48vanman said:
Anybody know why todays flight is cancelled?

Yep its due to PIA having a shortage of Airbus A310 aircraft. AP-BEQ which is one of the General Electric powered aircraft used for some European flights has been grounded in Kuala Lumpur due to a engine vibration which was observed by crew on take-off a few days ago. I understand it eventually returned and landed in Kuala Lumpur safely.
 
If we get a runway upgrade we might bag a B777 but as there are no plans or intentions to do so you can forget large aircraft movement unless they are empty, football charters, with light fuel loads, or operating via somewhere else outbound. The economic situation of the airport business is delicate and the site Lbia is built on gives little scope for development so we have what we have probably for the near future at least.
 
Why would we need a runway upgrade? Didn't b747s and such like used to use lba for flights to canada
 
Yes they did, but all went outbound via Birmingham. There wa sjust one flight that went direct to Canada and that was a DC10.
 
ls27 said:
Yes they did, but all went outbound via Birmingham. There wa sjust one flight that went direct to Canada and that was a DC10.
There were 2 direct 747s to Toronto. The first one on the day of the runway epening, the second was a diversion from Newcastle, when their runway was blocked.
The DC 10 just replaced a 747 and operated via Birmingham on the very last service to Toronto. It did land on runway 14 while the 747 never did.
 
I can second that.

In one of the old Leeds Bradford Airport Official Handbook it states "the first 747 operated with a full load of passengers and freight to Toronto". The key point to note is it didn't require a full load of fuel to make the journey.

It is clear the runway is long enough for certain long haul flights but with reduced operating margins airlines will be reluctant to operate from LBA.
 
I know it's going slightly off topic now but it's a shame LBA can't attract a long haul airline that operates a flight along the lines of Singapore airlines' morning flight from Manchester that operates via Munich - which I presume is a hub for Singapore?
 
I sure I've read elsewhere that the Leeds to Birmingham flight operated by Wardair was the shortest flight in the world to be operated by a Boeing 747 at the time?

But don't forget yes Jet2 have been sending Boeing 757-200's direct to New York. Thomson have sometimes managed use there Boeing 767's to Bridgetown along with a Thomas Cook Airbus A330. Also if I remember correctly Swe-fly actually started using there Boeing 762 direct to Lahore without the tech stop in Stockholm before it went bust!

Last but not least Shaheen and PIA have for the last 6 year's operated to Islamabad successfully direct without fuel stops.
 
Munich is not a hub for Singapore Airlines. It only has the SQ327/328 transit flight and that's their lot.
 
eastcoaster said:
ls27 said:
Yes they did, but all went outbound via Birmingham. There wa sjust one flight that went direct to Canada and that was a DC10.
There were 2 direct 747s to Toronto. The first one on the day of the runway epening, the second was a diversion from Newcastle, when their runway was blocked.
The DC 10 just replaced a 747 and operated via Birmingham on the very last service to Toronto. It did land on runway 14 while the 747 never did.


There was definitely a DC10 (included in my photos within the nostalgia section) that operated direct from LBA to Toronto, and it was not the last flight on the route which I was not there to see. Apart from the initial flight and the aforementioned Newcastle divert, only the DC10 operated direct. At that time the BHX runway was virtually the same length as LBA though, so it wasn't really anything to do with runway length.
 
I thought I was correct about the DC10. In the back of my mind I think it came in from Athens and did an extra flight. I might be wrong as memories are fading, and I am not sure about the runway usage as it would all depend on the wind direction at the time.
Certainly the DC8 of Worldways used 14 and 32.
 
I don't have any information on the DC10 visit other than I know it took place. As for direct from Leeds to Toronto it's all down to aircraft type and weight. The larger aircraft generally have a longer range so the fuel capacity is greater. A flight from Leeds to Toronto is relatively short so it's entirely possible. A quick look at Boeing's Technical Specifications the capacity of a classic is 199,158 Ltrs or (199 tons) with a maximum range of 12,700 km. A 747 fully loaded with passengers, freight and sufficient fuel to reach Toronto (approximately 4000km from LBA) only a third of the total fuel capacity so that's significantly less weight than a fully loaded 747. The overall weight of the aircraft would be reduced by well over 130 tons.
 

Upload Media

Remove Advertisements

Subscribe to help support your favourite forum and in return we'll remove all our advertisements. Your contribution will help to pay for things like site maintenance, domain name renewals and annual server charges.



Forums4aiports
Subscribe

NEW - Profile Posts

If anyone would like to share their local airport news right here in our news area let me know so I can give you the correct permissions to do so. It only takes a couple of minutes to upload a news story with an accompanying image. The news items can then be shared on the site homepage by you. #TakePart #Forums4airports Bring the news to one place!
survived a redundancy scenario where I work for the 3rd time. Now it looks likely I will get to cover work for 2 other teams.. Pretty please for a payrise? That would be a no and so stay on the min wage.
Live in Market Bosworth and take each day as it comes......
Well it looks like I'm off to Australia and New Zealand next year! Booked with BA from Manchester via Heathrow with a stop in Singapore and returning with Air New Zealand and BA via LAX to Heathrow. Will circumnavigate the globe and be my first trans-Pacific flight. First long haul flight with BA as well and of course Air NZ.
15 years at the same company was reached the weekend before last. Not sure how they will mark the occasion apart from the compulsory payirse to minimum wage (1st rise for 2 years; i was 15% above it back then!)
Ashley.S. wrote on Sotonsean's profile.
Welcome to the forum, I was born and bred in Southampton.

Trending Hashtags

Advertisement

Back
Top Bottom
  AdBlock Detected
Sure, ad-blocking software does a great job at blocking ads, but it also blocks some useful and important features of our website. For the best possible site experience please take a moment to disable your AdBlocker.