By the looks of things the aircraft showed on the arrivals list but not on the departures list, or are'nt at the moment, suggesting that they went out empty. Although, they still continued to MAN, with their original callsigns, so I wonder if the passengers did stay on.
Im sure we will recieve further details on where they parked and if the passengers got off etc. I do also hope someone got a photograph of them - would be good to see an aircraft in FCH colours since merged with Thomsonfly and stopped their Thursday route to Faro, along with the Iberworld and Air Europa that used to visit - good days.
Lucky you living under the flight path, I'm sure some neighbours won't be as enthusiastic as you to hear more flights due from LBA :LOL:
 
Concorde Lover said:
3 thomson planes, BMI plane, thomas cook, 2 jet2 and 2 monarch have diverted from Manchester in which 1 Thomson plane and the 2 jet2 aircraft have diverted to Leeds Bradford, a monarch one was to divert here but instead choose to go East midland due to the crew, also more are expected to divert as far as I am aware with some diverting to Leeds Bradford, tell you something LBA will be loving these diverts with the money they will gain from them.


Sorry I mean 2 thomson aircraft Diverted to Leeds
 
From what I've know this afternoons 2x Thomson Airways flights that diverted in from Manchester have not de-plane at LBA. They were both held on the ground and re-fueled to fly back to Manchester with passengers remaining onboard at all times and now MAN's arrivals boards are showing them both as Landed at MAN.
I guess this is also the reason as to them using there original inbound flight number instead off using a Positioning (TOM9000) flight number.

Now I don't know what the situation is for the Jet2 (LS880) that diverted in as well. As that has re-positioned back to MAN as LS880W which is a positioning flight number but MAN's arrivals boards are is still showing it as Diverted...
 
No Concordelover, as far as I am aware there were 2 TOM and just the one Jet2 from Alicante. That is all that was shown on the arrivals board, and all that I saw landing at the time. Perhaps another was intending to divert to Leeds, but the storm over MAN might have passed in time for them to go in there?
 
I remember seeing a Jet2 aircraft that looked like it was in the LBA hold. This might have been the extra Jet2 aircraft that eventually ended up landing at Manchester as planned.
 
I saw an aircraft in the hold too, but what I saw was a 737-800, which could have been Jet2, although at the time I assumed it was a Ryanair and couldn't understand why it was in the hold in the first place. It was more or less above me as the TOM A320 landed, so perhaps it received clearance to go back to MAN prior to commencing its approach into LBA.
 
White Heather said:
I saw an aircraft in the hold too, but what I saw was a 737-800, which could have been Jet2, although at the time I assumed it was a Ryanair and couldn't understand why it was in the hold in the first place. It was more or less above me as the TOM A320 landed, so perhaps it received clearance to go back to MAN prior to commencing its approach into LBA.

I saw the Jet2 737-300 in the hold (?) at least 20 minutes after the Thomson A320 had landed.

The plot thickens. :LOL:
 
Best make the most of it Concorde Lover - PMI to revert to AEA 738 next season. Although it will be nice to see AEA back at LBA.

And may I also welcome Applepie! With the cute little "I'm new here" sign and whatnot!!
 
Applepie, welcome, and my house is for sale if you want to live under the flight path!!

Seriously, it is very nice being so close. Trouble is now, that I don't want to move anywhere where I am NOT under the flight path, which limits my options somewhat when looking for a new place to live!
 
Whoshotjimmi, I don't see the logic in that. Why would TOM use a 767 this year, then reduce to an AEA 738 next summer??
Thats even less than what we had the summer before with Thomson's 757! Surely they used the 767 because they could fill it, so why limit the amount of passengers when you can easily fill the 767??
 
Logic isn't necessarily what dictates it, nor is it everyones strong point! I don't know the reasons why that decision has been taken but there has to be some thought process behind it. Perhaps TOM need their aircraft elsewhere. Perhaps the 767 isn't getting filled. Perhaps increased competition at LBA from other IT operators means the demand is waning. Anyhow, a lot can change between now and next summer. Let's be honest, a few weeks before the 2011 season started, Onur Air were to be operating into LBA. The source of that information is the LBAspotters website.

Perhaps TOM operations are now so firmly embedded at Donny, they want to pull out of LBA altogether. I would suggest the only reason the Corfu will still exist is because there is no-one else to operate it. If, indeed, it still does exist this time next year.
 
I don't think TOM will seize all their operations, and Corfu is currently operated by Jet2 on a Monday, I think(?)! The reason they have still kept some of their routes from LBA is, that they don't want to completely leave to then come back again if they finally see that their current DSA base isn't working.
They have kept some routes, in my opinion, so that their relationship with LBA still stands and that it makes things a lot easier for them to start routes up again, as it is to drop them, if they already have operations from the airport.
 
Lets remember that this time last year, the 2011 Palma flight was not intended to operate on a 767-300 - it was upgraded to that much later when (I presume) it was obvious that bookings were going well. There is plenty of time for next summers flight to be upgraded too, although it has to be said that TOM may well be looking to put the 767 to better use than the short hop down to Palma.
 

Upload Media

Remove Advertisements

Subscribe to help support your favourite forum and in return we'll remove all our advertisements. Your contribution will help to pay for things like site maintenance, domain name renewals and annual server charges.



Forums4aiports
Subscribe

NEW - Profile Posts

If anyone would like to share their local airport news right here in our news area let me know so I can give you the correct permissions to do so. It only takes a couple of minutes to upload a news story with an accompanying image. The news items can then be shared on the site homepage by you. #TakePart #Forums4airports Bring the news to one place!
survived a redundancy scenario where I work for the 3rd time. Now it looks likely I will get to cover work for 2 other teams.. Pretty please for a payrise? That would be a no and so stay on the min wage.
Live in Market Bosworth and take each day as it comes......
Well it looks like I'm off to Australia and New Zealand next year! Booked with BA from Manchester via Heathrow with a stop in Singapore and returning with Air New Zealand and BA via LAX to Heathrow. Will circumnavigate the globe and be my first trans-Pacific flight. First long haul flight with BA as well and of course Air NZ.
15 years at the same company was reached the weekend before last. Not sure how they will mark the occasion apart from the compulsory payirse to minimum wage (1st rise for 2 years; i was 15% above it back then!)
Ashley.S. wrote on Sotonsean's profile.
Welcome to the forum, I was born and bred in Southampton.

Trending Hashtags

Advertisement

Back
Top Bottom
  AdBlock Detected
Sure, ad-blocking software does a great job at blocking ads, but it also blocks some useful and important features of our website. For the best possible site experience please take a moment to disable your AdBlocker.