I just had one of those political low life morons on my doorstep oh and did I give her what for. She claimed Labour didn't want the airport to grow in such a huge way unsustainably. I said what, but you support the terminal extension which allows the same level of growth? She was an utter dimwit who wouldn't listen to anything I said. She was basically a green dressed as red with an evil splash of reform.
I’ve been fairly looky and avoided Racheal Reeves knocking on my door what with being away last few weeks here in Turkey
 
So today, Leeds West & Pudsey MP Rachel Reeves, our new tenant of 11 Downing Street, has announced a package of measures aimed at boosting the economy. Included are changes aimed at making it quicker and easier to secure planning consent, especially for projects relating to infrastructure which might boost the economy. She is also to increase funding to Councils to enable a significant increase in planning officers and some previously refused planning applications which again might boost the economy, are to be reviewed. All very laudable.

But, is it just me that finds this somewhat bemusing given that said Ms. Reeves actively did all she could together with the other 4 Leeds Labour MPs, to block the construction of a nice shiny new terminal at LBA on the grounds it would lead to the growth of the airport, which in turn would, without doubt, have boosted the economy locally, and therefore nationally too. Ms Reeves clearly has two hats to wear. One as an interfering negative thinking Leeds MP and now one as Chancellor where she seeks to undo damage to the economy which may not have been so great had MPs like her taken a more forward thinking line.

I know that in the end, our terminal wouldn't have been built due to COVID and vastly increased costs, but even so. Reeves didn't know that COVID would come galloping over the hill to put a stop to the scheme.
 
Yes and it's somewhat conflicting with the current "climate emergency" message. Surely thousands of new homes built on green belt will have an environmental impact along with all the co2 they will spew out during the building process and thereafter. Most if not all these new homes will be occupied by car owning residents who will need new roads and infrastructure to facilitate it will they not? Like I say, it's a mixed message so they will need to get all their ducks in order quickly if they're to do this without looking silly.
 

Jolly good! Note all three airports are owned/part owned by the same Aussie investment company . So, I guess that now, when JSO turn up at LBA to glue themselves to our runway or paint some aircraft orange, it'll be a certain and quick arrest and in addition to the criminal damage they'll be done for breaching a court injunction too.

'Unlike airports such as Heathrow, passengers use the runway to board a flight, adding to the risk a protest could occur near a plane'

I assume they mean apron, rather than runway. That being said are they suggesting that Protestors would purchase tickets and pose as legitimate travellers to gain access to the apron?
 
Last edited:
'Unlike airports such as Heathrow, passengers use the runway to board a flight, adding to the risk a protest could occur near a plane'

I assume they mean apron, rather than runway. That being said are they suggesting that Protectors would purchase tickets and pose as legitimate travellers to gain access to the apron?
Yes these reporter's can't tell the difference between a runway and an apron. If it's concrete, it's a runway. How many times do we read of delayed passengers sitting on the runway for hours, rather than on a plane, in their seat, on the apron/stand.

As for access to the runway, at Stansted they didn't bother pretending to be anything. Good old wire cutters got them through the perimeter fence in seconds .
 

Upload Media

Remove Advertisements

Subscribe to help support your favourite forum and in return we'll remove all our advertisements. Your contribution will help to pay for things like site maintenance, domain name renewals and annual server charges.



Forums4aiports
Subscribe

NEW - Profile Posts

If anyone would like to share their local airport news right here in our news area let me know so I can give you the correct permissions to do so. It only takes a couple of minutes to upload a news story with an accompanying image. The news items can then be shared on the site homepage by you. #TakePart #Forums4airports Bring the news to one place!
survived a redundancy scenario where I work for the 3rd time. Now it looks likely I will get to cover work for 2 other teams.. Pretty please for a payrise? That would be a no and so stay on the min wage.
Live in Market Bosworth and take each day as it comes......
Well it looks like I'm off to Australia and New Zealand next year! Booked with BA from Manchester via Heathrow with a stop in Singapore and returning with Air New Zealand and BA via LAX to Heathrow. Will circumnavigate the globe and be my first trans-Pacific flight. First long haul flight with BA as well and of course Air NZ.
15 years at the same company was reached the weekend before last. Not sure how they will mark the occasion apart from the compulsory payirse to minimum wage (1st rise for 2 years; i was 15% above it back then!)
Ashley.S. wrote on Sotonsean's profile.
Welcome to the forum, I was born and bred in Southampton.

Trending Hashtags

Advertisement

Back
Top Bottom
  AdBlock Detected
Sure, ad-blocking software does a great job at blocking ads, but it also blocks some useful and important features of our website. For the best possible site experience please take a moment to disable your AdBlocker.