Boeing Industries

  • Thread starter Thread starter Aviador
  • Start date Start date
  • Tagged users Tagged users None
By doing this do they risk the whole 737 series going toxic in the public eye if they can't distinguish between the variants? I for one would be very unhappy to fly on any 737 not knowing which type it is.
 
By doing this do they risk the whole 737 series going toxic in the public eye if they can't distinguish between the variants? I for one would be very unhappy to fly on any 737 not knowing which type it is.
I think it's clever marketing as 99% of flyers won't know the difference, my sister for example is a much more frequent flyer than me and wouldn't have a clue between the difference between an airbus or boeing let alone a 737 800 or a 737 8. The MAX name has become toxic, drop that and people will just think they are normal 737s and generally forget the name MAX.
 
I agree with Jerry, obviously people on here are clued up and can make informed decisions re aircraft type but Joe public mostly will not have a clue for example my wife has probably flown on 100 plus trips with me over the years and the only aircraft she ever regonised was a jumbo.

In all probability when Boeing sort out the MAX which they absolutely have to it will likely be the safest thing in the sky.
 
Last nights BBC Panorama was entitled Boeing’s Killer Plane.

Doesn’t come up with anything we haven’t already heard about the max and Mcas but might be of interest to some on the Iplayer
 
The "Dreamliner" has some bad press lately too. Boeing have some seriously hard work to do to improve their street cred again.
 
So I just read an article that Boeing were investigating updating the 767 with engines derived from the GENx engines being used on the 777X. Would be used primarily for cargo, but also a cheaper & quicker alternative to the proposed Boeing NMA:


Googled Boeing 767X and this came up:

View attachment 14971

Obviously a concept from when the original 757/767 was being designed, and not this new proposal.

Thoughts?

What would aviation look like today if Boeing had proceeded with the bottom design? Would we have the 777 now?
 
So I just read an article that Boeing were investigating updating the 767 with engines derived from the GENx engines being used on the 777X. Would be used primarily for cargo, but also a cheaper & quicker alternative to the proposed Boeing NMA:


Googled Boeing 767X and this came up:

View attachment 14971

Obviously a concept from when the original 757/767 was being designed, and not this new proposal.

Thoughts?

What would aviation look like today if Boeing had proceeded with the bottom design? Would we have the 777 now?

The bottom one looks like some of the motor coaches from the 1950s that had a top deck just at the rear. I think they looked ugly and so does the bottom design.
 
So I just read an article that Boeing were investigating updating the 767 with engines derived from the GENx engines being used on the 777X. Would be used primarily for cargo, but also a cheaper & quicker alternative to the proposed Boeing NMA:
I think they would find customers in United and Delta for that.
 
Do many people remember the DC10's reputation? It was similar to that currently 'enjoyed' by the MAX. It reincarnated as the MD11. See below video just before the minute mark.

 
Boeing are having a really bad time at the moment. I do hope they can pull through all the latest troubles. Only today there has been further bad press, and this time regarding the Boeing 737 NG (Next Generation) range of aircraft.

The NTSB has concluded there is a potential structural vulnerability in the engine casing on all Boeing 737 “Next Generation” (NG) aircraft. These are the versions of the twin-jet with the suffix -600, -700, -800 and -900.

More about this news can be found in the following link.

 
How long will it take Boeing to retrofit 7,000 aircraft?

In the meantime, if there is another similar incident with the NG it's possible the regulators will ground the lot as they did with the MAX. That would have a devastating effect on Boeing airlines such as Ryanair and TUI in our neck of the woods.
 
A very good point @TheLocalYokel as it would have a profound affect on the airline industry if that happens as there are so many of the types currently flying.
 
Boeing has just announced MAX production will be temporarily suspended with effect from January 2020.
 
Boeing have sacked their CEO Dennis Muilenburg as they seek to overcome the negative publicity and lost confidence in the B737Max.
 
Boeing really could do with a success story after all the recent bad press. The 777X looks very graceful landing at Boeing Field in Seattle.
 

Remove Advertisements

Subscribe to help support your favourite forum and in return we'll remove all our advertisements. Your contribution will help to pay for things like site maintenance, domain name renewals and annual server charges.



Forums4aiports
Subscribe

Heads Up!

For some weird reason, my days off work tend to involve being out of my flat by 5am and not getting back until 10pm. Back to work and the regular "fix" of 7.40am to 7.15pm hours
Heatwave Mk2 next week?
Some explosive weather build-ups currently in the North of England. What is it like where you are?
LBA: B737-300 G-GDFK empty down to Paris at 16:15 to operate the return LS268 back to Leeds 20:00 ETA where it will then operate the delayed LS265 to Malaga 20:40ETD
LBA: Albastar B737-800 EC-MUB positioning in tommorow afternoon from Gatwick 15:45 to operate a charter to Lourdes/Tarbes on Friday afternoon 14:00 AP7721 STC
I don't believe I am quite covering enough roles at work. Its now 4 on a bad day, 5 on a good day and there is scope for a 6th and 7th role. Still on minimum pay but had the biggest payrise in the company,

Trending Hashtags

Advertisement

Back
Top Bottom
  AdBlock Detected
Sure, ad-blocking software does a great job at blocking ads, but it also blocks some useful and important features of our website. For the best possible site experience please take a moment to disable your AdBlocker.