I am with you all 100% and I believe Look North should be challenged...where were the residents in NW Leeds, the vast majority like me, who could not care less about the noise, and welcome the fact the airport is busy and growing....look at Donny residents and how they fought for their airport....and for that matter I am getting more angry at how Look North supported DSA case for survival! Could we send a collective message to the Look North Editor demanding answers?
The problem with a collective voice is we don't have a spokesperson who is prepared to take on the BBC if asked.
 
The problem is that we cannot challenge the claim that LBA exceeded the night flying quota. The investigation outcome is not yet available .

My beef with the BBC is that they know this, yet once again, they are giving air time to a group whose sole purpose in their miserable lives is to kill LBA any way they can for purely selfish reasons. Giving them that air time in the current circumstances is about as far from balanced reporting as you can get, and it's not the first time either.

Tomorrow sees the start of British Summer Time, so, it would seem that every departure between 0600 and 0700, and every arrival scheduled for 2300 or later, will count towards the 2800 night movement limit. There are 6 tomorrow/early Monday morning for starters. The anti airport mob will have something to keep their sad lives occupied again.
 
Last edited:
The anti airport mob will have something to keep their sad lives occupied again.

Nail hit on the head. Let's hope that the preceding wind is favouring 14 and not 32. Cannot wait for the whole "I swear they get earlier every year" mob to start on the FB local community groups and them endlessly complaining about the airport. When a simple solution of "well if you don't like it move" is put to them they loose their stuff.
 
Well I hope they're not counting those Max aircraft.
They will have to until such time as the Planning Officer agrees that they don't count. That's an ongoing debate.

I have little doubt they shouldn't count, but that the Council will be very wary of the inevitable backlash from the enemy if/when it's agreed. This isn't really about noise. Or the environment. They are simply excuses used by a group who apparently simply want rid of the airport.
 
Look North: pointless report in reality. Outbreak of bird flu in Timbukto would have been more interesting. On a serious note, the local labour candidate for May elections listed in his 1st flyer (ha ha) that he would not fly for 10 years. OK but his update leaflet this week leaves out that pledge. I look foward to dicussing with him the position of Yorkshire familys who face a 30 hour train/ferry/train journey to visit families in Scandinavia.
Presumably I should emigrate. Oh well..................

Bhowani
 
Look North: pointless report in reality. Outbreak of bird flu in Timbukto would have been more interesting. On a serious note, the local labour candidate for May elections listed in his 1st flyer (ha ha) that he would not fly for 10 years. OK but his update leaflet this week leaves out that pledge. I look foward to dicussing with him the position of Yorkshire familys who face a 30 hour train/ferry/train journey to visit families in Scandinavia.
Presumably I should emigrate. Oh well..................

Bhowani
Exactly, there's no news, which is why it's very clear that the BBC (or their transport correspondent) are happily providing GALBA with a way to spout their negativity at a time when it's clear that neither LBA nor the Council will make any comment. Therefore, the report was entirely one sided and imbalanced.
 
Exactly, there's no news, which is why it's very clear that the BBC (or their transport correspondent) are happily providing GALBA with a way to spout their negativity at a time when it's clear that neither LBA nor the Council will make any comment. Therefore, the report was entirely one sided and imbalanced.
....and thats why this should be reported to the powers that be at the BBC
 
We "The LBA Support Group" have issued a press release today which is a positive news story for LBA and covers some of the issues raised by GALBA & reported by BBC on Friday night..


Sadly I suspect as is normal practice the local gutter press won't pick up on it.

We really do need somebody to stand up to be a public spokesperson for the group, so that we can get our voice heard more..
Any volunteers? If so pease send either myself @lbaspotter @Aviador or @White Heather a private message and we will endeavour to reply back to you ASAP with further details.
 
Last edited:
....and thats why this should be reported to the powers that be at the BBC
They get away with it by placing noise under the climate emergency umbrella. No opposing views necessary as its written in stone by former BBC bosses.

 
It's not as if aircraft are that noisy these days. When I first became interested in aviation in the early '70's. it was Comets, B737-200's, One-Elevens, DC-9-10/30's, B707's, VC-10's etc. These had an absolutely ear splitting roar and crackle to them. Today's jet aircraft make a soft 'buzz'. In comparison, a couple of nights ago someone was accelerating a motorbike up and down the High Street (I live about 1/4 mile away). It was far more annoying than the military jets that I get, going into RAF Lakenheath and RAF Mildenhall.
 
They get away with is by placing noise under the climate emergency umbrella. No opposing views necessary as its written in stone by a former bosses.

I'm surprised they don't have a specific paragraph on how to report negatively on aviation and in particular on LBA!

However, the report this week was entirely noise related - it barely mentioned emissions or climate, if at all. The woman interviewed in Headingley complained only of being awoken by planes

I have long held the view that this anti LBA group, like the last one, are NIMBYs of the highest order - and simply hide behind Environmental issues to suit their entirely selfish agenda.
 
I'm surprised they don't have a specific paragraph on how to report negatively on aviation and in particular on LBA!

However, the report this week was entirely noise related - it barely mentioned emissions or climate, if at all. The woman interviewed in Headingley complained only of being awoken by planes

I have long held the view that this anti LBA group, like the last one, are NIMBYs of the highest order - and simply hide behind Environmental issues to suit their entirely selfish agenda.
There is no climate advantage to travelling to other airports to get flights. The message has to be to fly from your local airport, wherever that may be.
 
We "The LBA Support Group" have issued a press release today which is a positive news story for LBA and covers some of the issues raised by GALBA & reported by BBC on Friday night..


Sadly I suspect as is normal practice the local gutter press won't pick up on it.

We really do need somebody to stand up to be a public spokesperson for the group, so that we can get our voice heard more..
Any volunteers? If so pease send either myself @lbaspotter @Aviador or @White Heather a private message and we will endeavour to reply back to you ASAP with further details.

Its a well written report, and you have shown how new aircraft are bringing noise and emissions down. Just one question on the number of destinations served. You say 70, and I thought LBA was at 80+ this summer season?
 

Upload Media

Remove Advertisements

Subscribe to help support your favourite forum and in return we'll remove all our advertisements. Your contribution will help to pay for things like site maintenance, domain name renewals and annual server charges.



Forums4aiports
Subscribe

NEW - Profile Posts

All checked in for my flight to Sydney from Manchester via Heathrow. Been waiting for this trip for nearly a year and now tomorrow I'll finally head to Australia and New Zealand!
If anyone would like to share their local airport news right here in our news area let me know so I can give you the correct permissions to do so. It only takes a couple of minutes to upload a news story with an accompanying image. The news items can then be shared on the site homepage by you. #TakePart #Forums4airports Bring the news to one place!
survived a redundancy scenario where I work for the 3rd time. Now it looks likely I will get to cover work for 2 other teams.. Pretty please for a payrise? That would be a no and so stay on the min wage.
Live in Market Bosworth and take each day as it comes......
Well it looks like I'm off to Australia and New Zealand next year! Booked with BA from Manchester via Heathrow with a stop in Singapore and returning with Air New Zealand and BA via LAX to Heathrow. Will circumnavigate the globe and be my first trans-Pacific flight. First long haul flight with BA as well and of course Air NZ.
15 years at the same company was reached the weekend before last. Not sure how they will mark the occasion apart from the compulsory payirse to minimum wage (1st rise for 2 years; i was 15% above it back then!)

Trending Hashtags

Advertisement

Back
Top Bottom
  AdBlock Detected
Sure, ad-blocking software does a great job at blocking ads, but it also blocks some useful and important features of our website. For the best possible site experience please take a moment to disable your AdBlocker.