Leeds Bradford: EasyJet Flights, New Routes & Schedule Updates

  • Thread starter Thread starter pcorbridge
  • Start date Start date
  • Tagged users Tagged users None
Use this prefix for new threads for Leeds Bradford Airport
If they just operate 2 or 4 times a week often with poor times, on routes where Jet2/Ryanair already fly more in a day than they did in a week, and you don't bother advertising the fact, it isn't really surprising that flights weren't as well booked as they would like, but, it has always been the case that airlines expect new routes to take a year or two to become profitable. Easyjet haven't given them that long. They have even axed Belfast that does have good loads and Paris too, abd Barcelona that was doing ok.

Something has clearly changed at Easyjet with a plan to gradually increase their presence towards a base, suddenly shelved, amid a statement which makes clear they don't have the aircraft to open another base before 2030. If they are short of aircraft in the next few years, it is inevitable that non based flying will be first up for the axe. Their exposure to high fuel prices as well has probably turned their LBA operation from marginal (as expected) to loss maker, and a reported 70% drop in profits has probably forced them to
They are still new routes. You can't claim we haven't had any new routes in years, because clearly, we have. What we need though are new routes that are not necessarily bucket and spade routes, which would be operated by other carriers. The likes of Istanbul, Athens, Berlin, Lisbon, Madrid, Valencia, Munich, Frankfurt, Milan, Cork etc. These 'other carriers' are precisely those who won't entertain LBA until terminal regen is finished.
Well i hope your correct wh reg the other carriers, so once regen is finished the airlines hopefully will be queuing up to fly from LBA, we shall see, but wow its certainly not been the best year for the airport.
 
Well i hope your correct wh reg the other carriers, so once regen is finished the airlines hopefully will be queuing up to fly from LBA, we shall see, but wow its certainly not been the best year for the airport.
Agreed on that which is a shame as they were heading for record passenger figures. The loss of Sun Express and Easyjet during the winter is likely to mean we might match last year at best. Lets just hope Wizz dont give up on the UK regional market.
 
Easyjet have never been up for a fight since Stelios left day to day operations...Stansted was a biggy for them but when faced with fast expansion from Ryanair they scaled back to Southend and Luton and left when Jet2 moved in...
I suspect their wish is to be part of a legacy airline group, pricing just below their lunacy prices and being used as a feeder with some bucket and spade stuff thrown in..

O Leary doesnt see them with a long run of independence ahead of them either..
 
Agreed on that which is a shame as they were heading for record passenger figures. The loss of Sun Express and Easyjet during the winter is likely to mean we might match last year at best. Lets just hope Wizz dont give up on the UK regional market.
Im fully aware that wizz have their own plans and visions for the future but in my opinion i feel LBA management should be lets say more in bed with wizz , with the correct marketing ( should that ever happen at LBA) a huge population and no interference from that certain airport over the hill then LBA could be a decent base for the airline. There are certainly plenty of routes i can think of that would do well, Who remembers philip meeson on look north back in 2002 i believe it was announcing LS? Something down that line would be icing on the cake! I bet most the population of west yorks are unaware easyjet operate from LBA ! So come on LBA lets get those airlines in, tell you what members its getting very frustrating im sure many on here feel the same!
 
Im fully aware that wizz have their own plans and visions for the future but in my opinion i feel LBA management should be lets say more in bed with wizz , with the correct marketing ( should that ever happen at LBA) a huge population and no interference from that certain airport over the hill then LBA could be a decent base for the airline. There are certainly plenty of routes i can think of that would do well, Who remembers philip meeson on look north back in 2002 i believe it was announcing LS? Something down that line would be icing on the cake! I bet most the population of west yorks are unaware easyjet operate from LBA ! So come on LBA lets get those airlines in, tell you what members its getting very frustrating im sure many on here feel the same!
Time for a serious reality check. It’s easy to sit behind a keyboard and say "LBA just needs to get in bed with Wizz," but that completely ignores how ULCC network planning actually works in 2026.
Wizz Air doesn't care about nostalgic announcements on Look North. They care about ultra fast 30 minute turnarounds, rock bottom landing fees, and high yield routes. Right now, with global fleet shortages and engine issues crippling capacity across Europe, Wizz is consolidating at massive hubs, not scattering aircraft across regional UK airports.

LBA isn't failing on marketing, they are fixing the broken, bottlenecked terminal infrastructure so the airport can actually handle modern airline requirements in the first place. Expecting Wizz to suddenly set up a base here under current industry conditions is total fantasy. No airport can work on the basis of a wishlist, you can already see how that plays out at Doncaster!
 
View attachment 33623

Ryanair facebook........Didn't take long!
Love him or loathe him, Michael never misses a trick..That's why he's successful and Easyjet have been bought out..I suspect Stelios gave the OK, as the biggest shareholder, because he was fed up of abysmal management and simply wanted rid of the whole bloody shebang....

Time for a serious reality check. It’s easy to sit behind a keyboard and say "LBA just needs to get in bed with Wizz," but that completely ignores how ULCC network planning actually works in 2026.
Wizz Air doesn't care about nostalgic announcements on Look North. They care about ultra fast 30 minute turnarounds, rock bottom landing fees, and high yield routes. Right now, with global fleet shortages and engine issues crippling capacity across Europe, Wizz is consolidating at massive hubs, not scattering aircraft across regional UK airports.

LBA isn't failing on marketing, they are fixing the broken, bottlenecked terminal infrastructure so the airport can actually handle modern airline requirements in the first place. Expecting Wizz to suddenly set up a base here under current industry conditions is total fantasy. No airport can work on the basis of a wishlist, you can already see how that plays out at Doncaster!
In a nutshell...excellent precis
 
sånn er det, or in English it is what it is! It just wasn’t Easyjet’s time and Ryanair as seen by their advert, and Jet2 by their email Yorkshire100 voucher for LBA bookings up to 31 August, show that our airlines are fully committed to LBA and will pick up the slack.
It’s disappointing, it brings home a bit of reality, but we don’t need to be dramatic 😜, there are new routes to look forward to, we will see larger aircraft and we will have a fully fit terminal soon.
The airline business is fickle and at some point it will be Leeds Bradford’s moment. Sometimes things like this help to give some impetus to others to raise their game, let’s see what Ryanair and Jet2 do next.
 
Time for a serious reality check. It’s easy to sit behind a keyboard and say "LBA just needs to get in bed with Wizz," but that completely ignores how ULCC network planning actually works in 2026.
Wizz Air doesn't care about nostalgic announcements on Look North. They care about ultra fast 30 minute turnarounds, rock bottom landing fees, and high yield routes. Right now, with global fleet shortages and engine issues crippling capacity across Europe, Wizz is consolidating at massive hubs, not scattering aircraft across regional UK airports.

LBA isn't failing on marketing, they are fixing the broken, bottlenecked terminal infrastructure so the airport can actually handle modern airline requirements in the first place. Expecting Wizz to suddenly set up a base here under current industry conditions is total fantasy. No airport can work on the basis of a wishlist, you can already see how that plays out at Doncaster!
That nostalgic announcement on look north together with endless advertisement which i can still remember transformed our little airport on the hill with a huge increase in pax, jet2 is now one of the largest airlines in the uk. I do agree with most you mention but im just saying With the correct marketing LBA can be a huge success for any airline.

sånn er det, or in English it is what it is! It just wasn’t Easyjet’s time and Ryanair as seen by their advert, and Jet2 by their email Yorkshire100 voucher for LBA bookings up to 31 August, show that our airlines are fully committed to LBA and will pick up the slack.
It’s disappointing, it brings home a bit of reality, but we don’t need to be dramatic 😜, there are new routes to look forward to, we will see larger aircraft and we will have a fully fit terminal soon.
The airline business is fickle and at some point it will be Leeds Bradford’s moment. Sometimes things like this help to give some impetus to others to raise their game, let’s see what Ryanair and Jet2 do next.
Well i hope ryanair and jet2 do something positive, the saying never put all your eggs in one basket has meaning to it!!
 
Last edited:
I think the positive to take from this is that as @White Heather has reported, the relationship between LBA and easyJet appears to remain a good one. Timing is everything when it comes to airline route and base decisions, and unfortunately it seems that the timing simply hasn’t worked out on this occasion.

LBA also has a slightly unusual problem in that the strength of Jet2 at the airport is both one of its greatest assets and, when trying to attract another major operator, potentially one of its drawbacks. Trying to establish a handful of non-based easyJet routes against a very large incumbent operation — with multiple daily frequencies, established brand recognition alongside an enormous holidays business was always going to be difficult. Adding two or four weekly flights to markets already served many times a week isn’t really comparable with entering an underserved market. Unfortunately that’s really the only way most carriers can and do enter a market. They don’t just sweep in with daily flights to a destination.

Southampton is a good comparison. easyJet has been able to establish and grow an operation there without anything resembling the level of direct competition it has faced at LBA. At Leeds, without a base and the scale and flexibility that comes with it, easyJet was effectively trying to establish itself around the edges of two already very well-established operators.

I also think it’s a little unfair to put the blame entirely at easyJet’s door when none of us knows the full story. There have been comments about a lack of advertising, or suggestions that easyJet hasn’t been prepared to compete since Stelios left, but I’m not sure the evidence really supports that. easyJet has continued to grow across its UK bases and over the last few years has added over 20 aircraft to current UK bases as well as opening / reopening new ones at BHX, NCL and SEN. I’d say it’s difficult to argue that the airline simply isn’t prepared to compete or invest where it sees the right opportunity - BHX and NCL already both being major bases for RYR, EXS and TOM. I struggle to think of another recent example where easyJet has established a presence at an airport and then withdrawn from it entirely. Airlines don’t remove routes and walk away from a market for no reason, particularly when they had previously been discussing further expansion.

The fact that LBA management still appear to have a good relationship with easyJet, and continue to talk positively about them, is also worth bearing in mind before putting all the blame at easyJet’s door. LBA management will know exactly what discussions have taken place and the reasons behind easyJet’s decision; we don’t. If they felt easyJet had simply failed to support the routes, wasn’t prepared to compete, or had messed the airport around, it seems unlikely that the relationship would still be described so positively. That suggests there is probably more to the decision than any of us on the outside know.
 
That’s a good summary @Severn. It’s been discussed on here before how big Jet2 are at LBA. It brings lots of positives in terms of frequency and choice and clearly they have built up a very loyal customer base over nearly 25 years. It makes perfect sense that if Easyjet’s strategy is to grow their holidays business, then they will have to appeal to Jet2’s customers and persuade some of them to switch. Operating flights from LBA is one way to do that. Rather than jumping in with a base from day 1 (which would be high risk for all sorts of reasons) they elected to operate a few routes initially and then slowly build. Downside of that is it ends up with less flexibility and poorer timings compared to Jet2 and its just very easy for Jet2 to defend that. If they’ve now decided that the earliest they will consider a base is 2030 and the outlook for oil prices and consumer confidence are a not great, then it makes sense to walk away and review it in a few years. Personally I’m not sure there is any more to it than that.
 
We all have our views on all this and when they announced BCN I said yet another "safe" route but was immediately shot down by someone (can't remember who) who said that BCN was extremely under-served. Well perhaps this U2 announcement says otherwise along with them not being able to compete with incumbent carriers. This brings me back to "safe" routes where I think they could have chosen better/unserved routes. But that would have needed them to have a base at the away base for those unserved routes. Anyway whatever the reason(s) are it is what it is and what they have tried hasn't worked in the way we had all hoped. Onwards and upwards hopefully.
 
The CAA data published every month gives a very accurate insight into which routes are served well or not. Personally I don’t think it’s a matter of too much debate. LBA-BCN is just one of many routes that are under served. But if serving it doesn’t fit with Easyjet’s strategy then they won’t serve it.
 
The CAA data published every month gives a very accurate insight into which routes are served well or not. Personally I don’t think it’s a matter of too much debate. LBA-BCN is just one of many routes that are under served. But if serving it doesn’t fit with Easyjet’s strategy then they won’t serve it.
If it is underserved ( and it is) you have to wonder why Vueling don't give it another go. They also came and went after one season some years ago.
 
We all have our views on all this and when they announced BCN I said yet another "safe" route but was immediately shot down by someone (can't remember who) who said that BCN was extremely under-served. Well perhaps this U2 announcement says otherwise along with them not being able to compete with incumbent carriers. This brings me back to "safe" routes where I think they could have chosen better/unserved routes. But that would have needed them to have a base at the away base for those unserved routes. Anyway whatever the reason(s) are it is what it is and what they have tried hasn't worked in the way we had all hoped. Onwards and upwards hopefully.
I have to disagree on this - I believe BCN is exactly the type of route they should have been operating from LBA, along with BFS and CDG. Those are the routes I'm particularly disappointed to be losing from them. I've been thinking recently also, I think easyJet's route to CDG killed Ryanair's route to BVA, while the 3 airlines competed Jet2 and easyJet seemed to get ok business to CDG while Ryanair really struggled at BVA, with one September having an average load of about 60 pax if I remember correctly

If it is underserved ( and it is) you have to wonder why Vueling don't give it another go. They also came and went after one season some years ago.
(From @White Heather) They were facing both Jet2 at a higher frequency and Monarch at that time

If I were to think of an ideal easyJet network from LBA it would look something like (not taking into account their bases and semi-taking into account where they normally fly): AGP and PMI with higher frequencies (4X weekly minimum), TFS, RAK, BCN, CDG, MXP, VCE, FCO, PSA (or somewhere in that area), MLA, ATH, KGS, RHO, AYT, DLM, BJV, AMS (Minimum 4X weekly), SSH/HRG, GVA (properly), BFS, NQY
 

Remove Advertisements

Subscribe to help support your favourite forum and in return we'll remove all our advertisements. Your contribution will help to pay for things like site maintenance, domain name renewals and annual server charges.



Forums4aiports
Subscribe

Heads Up!

For some weird reason, my days off work tend to involve being out of my flat by 5am and not getting back until 10pm. Back to work and the regular "fix" of 7.40am to 7.15pm hours
Heatwave Mk2 next week?
Some explosive weather build-ups currently in the North of England. What is it like where you are?
LBA: B737-300 G-GDFK empty down to Paris at 16:15 to operate the return LS268 back to Leeds 20:00 ETA where it will then operate the delayed LS265 to Malaga 20:40ETD
LBA: Albastar B737-800 EC-MUB positioning in tommorow afternoon from Gatwick 15:45 to operate a charter to Lourdes/Tarbes on Friday afternoon 14:00 AP7721 STC
I don't believe I am quite covering enough roles at work. Its now 4 on a bad day, 5 on a good day and there is scope for a 6th and 7th role. Still on minimum pay but had the biggest payrise in the company,

Trending Hashtags

Advertisement

Back
Top Bottom
  AdBlock Detected
Sure, ad-blocking software does a great job at blocking ads, but it also blocks some useful and important features of our website. For the best possible site experience please take a moment to disable your AdBlocker.